Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:02:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which is the most absurd objective proposed by Newt Gingrich?
#1
Putting mirrors in outerspace to light highways
 
#2
Colonizing the moon for resources such as moon rocks
 
#3
Repealing child labor laws so children can spend time in school being janitors rather than learning
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 81

Author Topic: Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular  (Read 39942 times)
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« on: January 24, 2012, 12:28:53 PM »

Could you provide examples of "no business being involved in?" About $1 trillion's worth if you can.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2012, 12:55:40 PM »
« Edited: January 24, 2012, 12:57:33 PM by King »

Could you provide examples of "no business being involved in?" About $1 trillion's worth if you can.

We were not running $1 trillion deficits twenty five years ago after the stock crash of 1987, when tax rates were lower than they are today, so obviously there is a spending problem. We are clearly spending more than we need to on areas where the government should be involved (e.g., national defense and Medicaid). Giving out $500 million loans to politically-connected fly-by-night operations is probably just the tip of the iceberg. Who knows what the next administration will uncover?

Tax rates were not lower then than they were today.  Even if somehow they were, the Reagan Tax bill in 1986 flat-taxed the Romney bracket earners and he would have paid an effective 28% on all income no more, no less--as opposed to just the 15% he paid on TOP income.

The reason we have deficits today is because people like Romney, who likely isn't even in the top 100,000 richest Americans paid only half the income tax they did 25 years ago.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2012, 01:24:44 PM »

...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.