Right to Life Caucus Organizing Convention (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:34:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Right to Life Caucus Organizing Convention (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Right to Life Caucus Organizing Convention  (Read 10285 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« on: December 08, 2011, 09:49:22 PM »

I'm interested in joining.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2011, 11:03:10 PM »

Aye
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2011, 12:16:22 AM »

if it passes, then we have standing to vote on it Tongue
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2011, 09:54:11 PM »

Does it make sense to say "We favor restrictions such as parental notification . . ."?

On the death penalty,  to me that is a clear instance of the right to life being violated, especially as it's a matter of life actively being taken away by the government.  But this is an Atlasian caucus, and if we don't want to address it unless it becomes an issue here, that's fine.   

I have my doubts about the issue of physician-assisted suicide, but I'm okay with opposition being a part of the platform in general terms.  I would suggest that "one does not have the right to forfeit the value of his or her own life, such as in physician-assisted suicide" is confusing because it sounds like it's saying that it actually forfeits the value of a life, or it intends to forfeit that value, neither of which is accurate from my perspective.  Does it make sense to replace "forfeit" with "violate"?    Also, we might consider addressing other forms of euthanasia besides assisted suicide.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2011, 12:52:06 AM »

I'm still not clear on what you mean by people who forfeit the value of their lives in assisted suicide.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2011, 11:28:39 AM »

I'm still not clear on what you mean by people who forfeit the value of their lives in assisted suicide.

Yeah, that was also a bad sentence. Do you like the new one better?
Yes, that's works better.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.