New NBC/Marist polls for IA and NH
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 07:52:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  New NBC/Marist polls for IA and NH
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: New NBC/Marist polls for IA and NH  (Read 1781 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 04, 2011, 11:06:16 AM »

Iowa:

Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president?

43% Approve
46% Disapprove

47-37 Obama/Gingrich
46-39 Obama/Romney
42-42 Obama/Paul
48-37 Obama/Perry
54-31 Obama/Bachmann
50-32 Obama/Cain

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/A_Politics/_Today_Stories_Teases/111204_NBCMarist_Iowa_6a.pdf

New Hampshire:

Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president?

40% Approve
52% Disapprove

43-46 Obama/Romney
49-39 Obama/Gingrich
44-42 Obama/Paul
51-36 Obama/Perry
53-33 Obama/Bachmann
53-30 Obama/Cain

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/A_Politics/_Today_Stories_Teases/111204_NBCMarist_NH_6a.pdf
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,298


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2011, 11:14:18 AM »

Oh my. Is that Ron Paul, the amazing unelectable candidate, tying Obama in a state that's usually lean-safe Democrat (and ahead by a net of 7% of the "electable" candidate selected by the "anyone but Obama" crowd)? Things certainly are getting interesting.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,458
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2011, 02:32:51 AM »
« Edited: December 05, 2011, 02:35:32 AM by Eraserhead »

The Obama-Paul numbers in Iowa seem pretty bizarre. Everything else looks fairly reasonable.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2011, 03:04:11 AM »

Jesus those are crappy numbers for Obama in New Hampshire.
Logged
argentarius
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 843
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2011, 03:57:06 AM »

Jesus those are crappy numbers for Obama in New Hampshire.
I disagree, to be beating all but Romney is very good for him. It's almost a lost cause if Romney's the nominee.

Great numbers for Paul, I'm delighted. Marist polls used to never favour him.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2011, 08:16:54 AM »

Jesus those are crappy numbers for Obama in New Hampshire.
Up by 10 points against the current frontrunner? I'll take it.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2011, 08:57:18 AM »

The Obama-Paul numbers in Iowa seem pretty bizarre. Everything else looks fairly reasonable.

Iowa has plenty of people against Bush-Obama foreign policy.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2011, 11:19:17 AM »

Maybe Ron Paul is going to be the new 'flavor of the month'.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2011, 11:25:35 AM »

Jesus those are crappy numbers for Obama in New Hampshire.
Up by 10 points against the current frontrunner? I'll take it.

And only down by three against someone who's been campaigning there for the better part of a year? Great news for Obama.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,109
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2011, 12:43:02 PM »

The Paul numbers are certainly fool's gold for his "fans", 42% is done close to the floor for Republicans in Iowa.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,644
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2011, 02:37:04 PM »

Iowa appears to be shifting left relative to the nation since 2004, while pretty much everywhere else in the Midwest has moved right.  Any ideas for how to explain this?  Ethanol comes to mind, but that might be too simplistic.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2011, 02:50:14 PM »

The Paul numbers are certainly fool's gold for his "fans", 42% is done close to the floor for Republicans in Iowa.

     Everyone else is below the floor in that case. Disowned by Iowa? Tongue
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,458
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2011, 02:51:32 PM »

The Obama-Paul numbers in Iowa seem pretty bizarre. Everything else looks fairly reasonable.

Iowa has plenty of people against Bush-Obama foreign policy.

Hardly anyone is voting based on the candidate's foreign policy stands in this election.
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,298


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 05, 2011, 02:59:54 PM »

The Obama-Paul numbers in Iowa seem pretty bizarre. Everything else looks fairly reasonable.

They aren't bizarre if you consider the crosstabs from other polls and look at Iowa in terms of Paul's primary numbers.

A very common feature of these general election polls is Paul performing best among Republicans with independents (occasionally beating Obama where the rest fail), but Republicans not falling behind him as solidly as behind Romney (a bit like the "if not Clinton then we aren't voting Obama crowd that was polled to exist during the Democratic primaries"). Here, the Republicans are already okay with Paul, and thus fall behind him. In addition, independents presumably are behind him as well (or, alternatively, they are a larger proportion of the voters in this poll), so it balances out in his favour.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2011, 08:17:25 PM »

The Obama-Paul numbers in Iowa seem pretty bizarre. Everything else looks fairly reasonable.

Iowa has plenty of people against Bush-Obama foreign policy.

Hardly anyone is voting based on the candidate's foreign policy stands in this election.

And that would help with the pro-war GOPers that like Paul's economic and fiscal stances. The anti-war people, however, care.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,737


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 07, 2011, 04:10:55 PM »

I wouldn't get too excited about 42%-42%, Ron Paul fans.  You just know who those 14% undecided are.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2011, 06:45:51 PM »

I wouldn't get too excited about 42%-42%, Ron Paul fans.  You just know who those 14% undecided are.

Conservatives who join and become rank-n-file. We know about them.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.237 seconds with 14 queries.