When Rossi was leading, Gregoire and the Democrats wanted a recount. Then after the recount when Gregoire was leading, Rossi and the Republicans want a revote. What's to say that another recount would not put Rossi back ahead? What's to say another recount after that would not put Gregoire back ahead. Why weren't the votes certified when Rossi was ahead. Why not do another recount before certifying? (Yeah, there is a dead line to certify them.)
If there is revote would the third candidate be allowed in as well, or would this be more of a run-off (almost like Louisiana)? And knowing how most people voted, would people who voted for the other candidate still vote for that person or would they vote for Rossi or Gregoire instead?
It was a complete statewide manual recount.
That never happened in Florida 2000, or Ohio 2004.
There's nothing left to count.