SENATE BILL: Dept. of Ext. Aff.: September 2011 Foreign Policy Review (law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:36:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Dept. of Ext. Aff.: September 2011 Foreign Policy Review (law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Dept. of Ext. Aff.: September 2011 Foreign Policy Review (law'd)  (Read 9410 times)
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« on: December 12, 2011, 06:40:00 PM »
Do you mind detailing the reason for restrictions?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2011, 06:49:54 PM »
Quote from: Marokai Breakneck on December 12, 2011, 06:46:39 PM
Forgive my ignorance for such a simple question, but what does "full military restrictions" entail?

It's described in the bill. Wink
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #2 on: December 14, 2011, 12:02:22 PM »
I will consider it friendly.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2011, 12:04:29 PM »
Quote from: Secretary of External Affairs Ben on December 14, 2011, 10:09:11 AM
I submitted a full FPR; Napoleon just submitted Asia.

And I fully support Kal's amendment.

I stopped hitting show post when I found the most recent post. Can you make them into one post?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2011, 06:03:28 PM »
I've been celebrating an anniversary with my girlfriend. Please forgive me for my lack of punctuality this weekend.

All amendments are accepted as friendly except giving Israel a new status.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2011, 11:42:29 PM »
Ill accept the two and request others' opinions regarding China.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2011, 10:27:18 AM »
I will accept the China amendment as friendly, after further thought.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2011, 10:30:30 PM »
If the administration has plans to act, they can ask the Senate to authorize then. I'm not in favor of giving the executive branch authority to act without first having the Senate give input.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2011, 05:30:34 PM »
Thus amendment was withdrawn.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #9 on: December 29, 2011, 12:11:04 PM »
Quote from: Secretary of External Affairs Ben on December 29, 2011, 11:38:08 AM
Napoleon, are you ever going to ask for clarification?  If not, we should move ahead to a final vote, I think.

Clarification of what?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #10 on: December 29, 2011, 08:04:33 PM »
Restrictions on UAE but not Pakistan?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2011, 12:38:16 AM »
Amendment:

Partial military restrictions for Pakistan

Can we consider normalizing relations with UAE?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2012, 01:28:30 AM »
Amendment: change relations with UAE to Normal.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2012, 01:36:25 AM »
Last amendment, I promise! Grin
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2012, 04:26:39 AM »
Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.