Help needed for 2012 National Congressional Map
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:27:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Help needed for 2012 National Congressional Map
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8
Author Topic: Help needed for 2012 National Congressional Map  (Read 29230 times)
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: January 07, 2012, 11:10:41 AM »

Texas doesn't have any congressional districts.


It doesn't? I thought a court ordered interim use of these districts.
The Supreme Court has stayed the order by the San Antonio district court.  After that happened, the district court extended the filing deadline, and said that candidates could specify which map they were filing under.

Is it known when the Supreme Court will make its decision?

Yeah, the Supreme Court really screwed things up here.  Oral arguments will start Monday.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,303
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: January 07, 2012, 11:46:38 AM »

Will Texas end up with one or the other of the court or legislative maps?
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: January 08, 2012, 03:36:18 AM »
« Edited: January 08, 2012, 03:58:24 AM by jimrtex »

Will Texas end up with one or the other of the court or legislative maps?
Who knows?

Canseco amicus brief.

http://tinyurl.com/bvrfbbu

Cato institute amicus brief (discussing conflict of Section 2 and 5 of VRA)

http://tinyurl.com/d9uuh8t

Project for Fair Representation amicus brief arguing that CVAP should be used for drawing districts under one man one vote principles of Reynolds v Sims

http://tinyurl.com/dxvlrm6
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: January 21, 2012, 06:50:57 PM »
« Edited: January 21, 2012, 07:26:11 PM by MilesC56 »

I think they ended up keeping the WV districts.

Sorry Nathan; we'll need a new TX map... Sad

I also added Presidential results for GA, SC, OK and NV.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: January 28, 2012, 08:50:58 PM »

Bump.



Does anyone have Virginia?
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,376


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: January 28, 2012, 10:01:14 PM »

When are we going to be considering Arizona and New Mexico final?
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: January 28, 2012, 10:42:20 PM »

When are we going to be considering Arizona and New Mexico final?

The link that Miles gave me says that the Arizona plan is indeed final.  I don't know about NM, but I think they're close to passing a map (if they haven't already).

BTW Virginia's plan is officially law. 

https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en&hl=en&key=0At9k6QrlThx6dGlNZlFBRGQtVjNud1UwaXh3aXNpdXc&output=html



Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: January 28, 2012, 11:17:19 PM »

We should get Shilly in here, since he practically did all the states by himself.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: January 29, 2012, 10:34:06 PM »
« Edited: January 29, 2012, 10:47:08 PM by Fuzzy »

Arizona added.


Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: February 11, 2012, 04:16:15 PM »

Kentucky:



For the remaining states:

NM: Basically the same.
KS: I think they'll have a map out here soon.
MN: No idea.
FL: This map passed both chambers.
VA: I think we have a final map here.
I'm not sure about NY, NH, RI and CT.

Looks like we can re-do TX now. This looks like compromise map.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: February 11, 2012, 04:28:42 PM »

Ri passed a map. Last I checked, it was on the governor's desk, but that was some days ago. Ct has a court drawn map. TX really is more of a compromise offer. If Republicans went back and actually passed that map in the legislature and withdrew their old one, then it would probably stand up in court, but as an actual compromise it appears to not fly.

That leaves NH, NY, MN, KS and TX on the table, with TX the only one of those to even have a likely map. (KS has two, very different ones. Despite Republican control.)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: February 11, 2012, 04:34:27 PM »
« Edited: February 11, 2012, 04:39:35 PM by Minion of Midas »

Actually, seems like the Wyandotte-to-first-district, idea, is dead. Though second district Republicans are still balking at what losing Manhattan to the 1st and some R suburbs to the 3rd and gaining Lawrence is doing to their district, and are coming up with all sorts of alternatives, like a Wichita-to-southeast-corner fourth.

This is the main proposed map: http://redistricting.ks.gov/_Plans/Proposed_Plans/m5_sunflower9c/m5_sunflower9c.html
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: February 11, 2012, 05:05:25 PM »

And further research reveals that Chafee has signed it. And also that CT's map, drawn by a special master some weeks ago, was officially adopted by the State Supreme Court today.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: February 11, 2012, 06:05:52 PM »

Actually, seems like the Wyandotte-to-first-district, idea, is dead. Though second district Republicans are still balking at what losing Manhattan to the 1st and some R suburbs to the 3rd and gaining Lawrence is doing to their district, and are coming up with all sorts of alternatives, like a Wichita-to-southeast-corner fourth.

This is the main proposed map: http://redistricting.ks.gov/_Plans/Proposed_Plans/m5_sunflower9c/m5_sunflower9c.html

Ok. I heard that a coalition of moderate Republicans and Democrats were fighting the conservative Republicans over redistricting the KS legislature.

 
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: February 11, 2012, 06:19:30 PM »

I'm tackling TX right now...
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: February 12, 2012, 01:48:15 AM »

Added KS, NM and revised TX.

Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,828
Marshall Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: February 12, 2012, 03:51:33 AM »


I hope this doesn't take too long.

The last status hearing, the SA court took a recess to call the DC court to find out when they might issue their ruling.  People were able to use their cell phones for pictures during that break, and there were about 100 lawyers in the room.

About 1/2 hour after the SA court had come back, they took another recess to go talk to the DC court who had called back.  The next status hearing was moved from the 15th to the 14th so they could go to a 2nd day if necessary.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: February 12, 2012, 04:50:16 PM »


Great job!  Smiley   



BTW,  does that map keep the proposed new minority-majority district in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area?  It kind of looks like it, but I can't quite tell. 
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: February 12, 2012, 11:20:02 PM »

Re: Minnesota, I found an article which says that the courts will impose Minnesota maps on February 21.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: February 13, 2012, 12:19:28 AM »


Great job!  Smiley   



BTW,  does that map keep the proposed new minority-majority district in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area?  It kind of looks like it, but I can't quite tell. 

Thanks Smiley

Yes, the district (CD-33) running through Dallas and Tarrant counties is 61% Hispanic. It reminds me of Martin Frost's old district.

Re: Minnesota, I found an article which says that the courts will impose Minnesota maps on February 21.

Great.

The only major states left then would be NY and FL.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,376


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: February 13, 2012, 12:20:36 AM »

What about VA?
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: February 13, 2012, 12:28:16 AM »


VA passed a map. I think the lines are bit hard to make out.

Someone could do VA.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,376


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: February 13, 2012, 01:13:03 AM »


I'll do VA.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: February 13, 2012, 01:14:54 AM »

Is TX-18 contiguous? Also same question for TX-2.

What a disgusting map... Honestly I am amazed that people complain about California's new system when you compare it to what is happening in NC, TX, MD and IL
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: February 13, 2012, 01:49:25 AM »

Is TX-18 contiguous? Also same question for TX-2.

What a disgusting map... Honestly I am amazed that people complain about California's new system when you compare it to what is happening in NC, TX, MD and IL

Yep. TX-02 has an interesting crescent moon shape and 18 is similar to its current form.

Here's the TX plan.

I agree. Redistricting should be taken out of the hands of legislatures.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 12 queries.