Who would Condi Rice benefit the most as VP?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 08:35:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Who would Condi Rice benefit the most as VP?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If she wants to run
#1
Romney
 
#2
Gingrich
 
#3
Paul
 
#4
Perry
 
#5
Bachmann
 
#6
Santorum
 
#7
Huntsman
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 18

Author Topic: Who would Condi Rice benefit the most as VP?  (Read 1586 times)
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 19, 2011, 10:19:00 PM »

I think Perry or Bachmann. Huntsman can stand alone on foreign policy credentials. Romney and Huntsman definitely don't need a pro-choice VP. Paul would never have her on the ticket nor would she want to be on his ticket. She could benefit Gingrich with the woman vote.

What are your thoughts. And do you think she should be a viable option on the shortlist?
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2011, 10:20:47 PM »

Perry or Bachmann since they are incompetent on foreign policy.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2011, 10:22:45 PM »

Perry or Bachmann since they are incompetent on foreign policy.

This, though she'd obviously never accept.
Logged
M
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2011, 12:46:40 AM »

George W. Bush in 2004.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2011, 01:13:27 AM »

Barack Obama.  Just in case he wants to shore up the black vote.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2011, 01:41:10 AM »

Nobody
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 20, 2011, 03:55:21 AM »

Gadhafi in heaven, literally and figuratively.
Logged
qochimodo
Rookie
**
Posts: 26
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 20, 2011, 04:52:38 AM »

No one

Gadhafi in heaven, literally and figuratively.

Seriously what was up with that! Gadhafi was one of the richest dictators on earth, had literally millions of woman he could hand pick from and he had the hots for with one of the...... what a waste
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 20, 2011, 05:08:15 AM »

No one

Gadhafi in heaven, literally and figuratively.

Seriously what was up with that! Gadhafi was one of the richest dictators on earth, had literally millions of woman he could hand pick from and he had the hots for with one of the...... what a waste

The Gadhafi wants what it wants.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 20, 2011, 11:02:57 AM »

Gadhafi in heaven, literally and figuratively.

No way is Gadhafi in heaven, literally.  Wink

In order:

1.  Perry. It would give the ticket foreign policy credentials and gravitas.  I would also help modify the "good ole boy" Southerner image, and help with women.

2.  Paul.  He needs better foreign policy credentials. 

3.  Santorum.  It would give him better foreign policy credentials and indicate he was not hard right on social issues.

4.  Bachman.  Same as Santorum.  The major disadvantage would be two women on the ticket.

[I think 2, 3, and 4 are impossible.  The candidate would never accept them and Rice would not run with them.]

5.  Romney.  He's not too bad on foreign policy, but Rice would boost that.  Both, however, are seen as to middle of the road on social issues.

6.  Gingrich.  Helps with foreign policy, but both are intellectual.  Maybe they would get the endorsement of Adlai Stevenson's ghost.

7.  Huntsman.  Does virtually nothing for either of them.

I agree with Bush 04.  Could you have imagined what 2008 would have looked like? 



Logged
M
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2011, 11:12:03 AM »

No one

Gadhafi in heaven, literally and figuratively.

Seriously what was up with that! Gadhafi was one of the richest dictators on earth, had literally millions of woman he could hand pick from and he had the hots for with one of the...... what a waste

He was a sick creep, but she IS a good-looking woman.
Logged
The_Texas_Libertarian
TXMichael
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 825
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2011, 12:25:47 PM »

She has said she is "mildly pro-choice"
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2011, 12:45:29 PM »

She would be great if Paul actually did pick her, but no way in hell would she accept, nor would he offer. I think its Romney.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2011, 02:32:17 PM »

Perry.  Won't happen.

I could see her as NSA or SECDEF, SECSTATE for a lesser candidate.  She won't be a VP candidate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 14 queries.