VOTE (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:00:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  VOTE (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: VOTE  (Read 19480 times)
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


« on: December 04, 2003, 04:44:33 PM »

Well the Democrats  were registering the dead in 2002 out in SD, maybe an opening for you.
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2003, 05:06:18 PM »

I have proof of REGISTRATIONS of the dead.  A lady was hired by the Dems and later Charged and convicted for it. After the scandal broke the Dems fired her of course and rightly so.  Can't remember her name off hand, but this one is lookupable.
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2003, 05:29:21 PM »

Well a lot of it was discovered in Oct and while many counties were going over the registrations , they said that when they were about to have the elections they couldn't guarantee that all the regiustrations that were illegal.  I think they have now scrubbed everyone's registration afterwards.


Ok, so if she was fired, I assume the name was taken off the rolls then and voters were not cast under it. There definitely may be shenanigans by some people with their own agendas, but as long as the state party takes care of them and makes sure the name was off the rolls, then you can't blame the Dems. The bottom line is were any votes actually cast under the names of dead people?
And again, I hate to beat a dead horse, but is it really "good for the state" to not challenge this kind of thing? The fact that Thune didn't challenge it, is, in my opinion, a big piece of evidence against the validity of the charges.
That's just my $0.02 though...If you have good solid evidence, then I'm glad that you would bring it to light. But charges of voter fraud are serious business and shouldn't be tossed around without clear specifics of who, what, when, and how.
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2003, 05:30:40 PM »

Yes as long as they do both --get interested and vote.  I hate when I hear people from either party say I vote for him or her b/c he was nice looking or some factor that really doesn't matter.


Amen to that! Greater interest and participation in politics by everyone would definitely be a good thing.
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2003, 01:08:27 AM »

dem rep-- hello young one then.

1994 GOP Revolution is when I first voted.  Nice start to the voting for me! took back Congress!

Vote mostly GOP, definately for national offices, some local Dems and even a few state ones, such as state AG have gotten my vote.  

I like some Southern Dems but a vote for them supports Ted Kennedy and Hilliary and Chck "take my guns" Schumer and so glad I don't live in those states.
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2003, 10:17:17 AM »

definately will be voting and for Bush.  On a border now and will likely move within next few months.  But gives me good regional coverage.

VOTE FOR BUSH!
Logged
jravnsbo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,888


« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2003, 09:18:26 AM »

well I'm ona  border state and probably will be moving soon, so thought I'd wait till I moved or then people would ask why did your state switch.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.