Official Iowa Caucus Results Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:17:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Official Iowa Caucus Results Thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Official Iowa Caucus Results Thread  (Read 54971 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« on: January 03, 2012, 10:36:01 PM »

Given what's out, I'd be a little surprised if Santorum's not the winner, whatever winner means in this race.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2012, 10:39:07 PM »

Nearly a three-way tie.

All in all, the ultimate winner is someone not running in the Republican caucus.

Please keep your useless drivel to the approval ratings thread, thank you.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #2 on: January 03, 2012, 11:57:45 PM »

What is Bachmann trying to prove? She got 6 points in her de facto home state.

She's trying to act as a stalking-horse for Romney.  But that's been rather clear for almost forever.  She isn't smart enough, of course, to figure out that she gains nothing from that.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2012, 12:11:44 AM »

And now the race actually begins...
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2012, 12:40:25 AM »

If Santorum wins tonight, it is a monument to wasting time in a state that cares about you wasting time in their state when you have a whole bunch of crappy opponents.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #5 on: January 04, 2012, 12:48:54 AM »


There's no law saying you have to stay up to watch this crap.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #6 on: January 04, 2012, 12:51:04 AM »

This is seriously a Reaganesque speech.

Please get off your knees before Michelle Bachmann's husband decides to join you.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #7 on: January 04, 2012, 12:52:08 AM »

What is so special about Rick in keeping and re-attracting manufacturing jobs to the US?  I don't recall him being a protectionist type per se (I won't vote for a protectionist, but then I won't vote for Rick anyway, but I digress). So what makes him special?

Considering where he's from, why is his position here surprising?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #8 on: January 04, 2012, 12:59:59 AM »

What is so special about Rick in keeping and re-attracting manufacturing jobs to the US?  I don't recall him being a protectionist type per se (I won't vote for a protectionist, but then I won't vote for Rick anyway, but I digress). So what makes him special?

Considering where he's from, why is his position here surprising?

No, what is special about Rick's policy prescriptions? Mittens talks tough about China too (currency "manipulation"), although of course the US has very little bargaining power vis a vis China at the moment.

You are getting into details that most voters don't care about.  Just saying China would work for Mitt too if anyone believed him.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #9 on: January 04, 2012, 01:15:47 AM »

If this is going to turn into another Keystone Phil vs. the world thread, please lock it.

Also, it is kind of funny to note once again how clueless the non-Christian western world is.  Not that I would ever support anyone like Santorum, but I understand where he's coming from.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.