Mittens does not agree with the "privacy" prong of the SCOTUS elaboration upon the Constitution, and neither do I. Indeed, SCOTUS itself been embarrassed by it, and has largely abandoned that doctrine when it comes to a women's right to choose on abortion matters, to something more along the lines of undue burden, and essential liberty, and such. Mittens is well aware of
Griswald, a case which was planned and generated by Yale law profs, who actually choreographed the "crime," to test a Connecticut law banning the sale on contraceptives (how times have changed), which was gathering dust, and not enforced.
And there you have it!
