Senate Resolution Calling for a Constitutional Convention.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 01:45:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Senate Resolution Calling for a Constitutional Convention.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Senate Resolution Calling for a Constitutional Convention.  (Read 6134 times)
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: January 09, 2005, 02:51:36 PM »

Nay.
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: January 09, 2005, 02:56:12 PM »

The midwest and pacific governors should be raising hell about being under represented.

Thats what happens when you only have 25 voters comapred to something like 50 that i have.
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: January 09, 2005, 02:56:24 PM »

The midwest and pacific governors should be raising hell about being under represented.

The Pacific has the same number of delegates as the Mid-East and the South-Eastern Regions so I fail to see why they would be angry. The Mid-West has almost nobody in it so they aren't really either.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,974
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: January 09, 2005, 02:57:37 PM »

The midwest and pacific governors should be raising hell about being under represented.

The Pacific has the same number of delegates as the Mid-East and the South-Eastern Regions so I fail to see why they would be angry. The Mid-West has almost nobody in it so they aren't really either.
it means the northeast can trample the rights of the midwest at will.
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: January 09, 2005, 02:59:21 PM »

The midwest and pacific governors should be raising hell about being under represented.

The Pacific has the same number of delegates as the Mid-East and the South-Eastern Regions so I fail to see why they would be angry. The Mid-West has almost nobody in it so they aren't really either.
it means the northeast can trample the rights of the midwest at will.

Not on its own it can't. The North-Eastern Region has seven delegates out of a total of seventeen, the other regions could trample on the North-East if they joined together as could the regions by going against any of them, I fail to see your point?
Logged
MAS117
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,206
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: January 09, 2005, 04:00:12 PM »

The midwest and pacific governors should be raising hell about being under represented.

The Pacific has the same number of delegates as the Mid-East and the South-Eastern Regions so I fail to see why they would be angry. The Mid-West has almost nobody in it so they aren't really either.
it means the northeast can trample the rights of the midwest at will.

Not on its own it can't. The North-Eastern Region has seven delegates out of a total of seventeen, the other regions could trample on the North-East if they joined together as could the regions by going against any of them, I fail to see your point?

I agree with the distuinguished Senator from California.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: January 09, 2005, 04:06:10 PM »

What system will be used to ratify a new constitution?
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: January 10, 2005, 01:55:48 AM »

Yea
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: January 10, 2005, 02:23:52 AM »

Yea.

I don't know how I missed voting until now.  Apologies for that.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,664
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: January 10, 2005, 06:35:14 AM »

Aye
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: January 10, 2005, 08:09:34 AM »

What system will be used to ratify a new constitution?

The Convention will doubtless decide that by putting an appropriate clause/section into the Constitution itself. To date I've left that issue undecided in my draft because I think there are several ways for it to be done.
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: January 10, 2005, 04:14:31 PM »

Yea.
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: January 10, 2005, 04:31:50 PM »

With six votes in favour to one against the resolution has passed.

I believe it calls for the first meeting to be the seventeenth of January so I hope the Governors can get picking on delegates!
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: January 10, 2005, 04:55:49 PM »

It also specifies that the President is to call for the Convention.
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: January 10, 2005, 04:58:24 PM »

It also specifies that the President is to call for the Convention.

Yes it does Smiley I know he has to do that, as does he I believe, oh and to correct my earlier statement it says the first meeting should be by the seventeenth.
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: January 10, 2005, 09:06:52 PM »

For the record, even though it already passed: Yea.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: January 16, 2005, 11:03:42 AM »

Why are some governors picking alternate delegates? No alternate delegates mentioned here.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: January 16, 2005, 12:16:58 PM »

Well, I picked an alternate, because I hadn't had the chance to confirm all of my choices by the time I made the announcement.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: January 16, 2005, 12:42:35 PM »

Yeah, ILV picked two alternates as consolation prizes because some people were disappointed he picked only two leftists. Which I can understand (the disappointment, not the consolation prizes.)
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: January 16, 2005, 05:48:06 PM »

I seem to remember voting on this, but I guess I was wrong.

Yea
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 11 queries.