What's better for Paul's campaign? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 05:32:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  What's better for Paul's campaign? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What's better for Paul's campaign?  (Read 402 times)
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


« on: January 26, 2012, 03:17:18 PM »

Newt, obviously.

Newt lacks the staying power to have an effect in the upcoming caucuses, and his appeal there is limited anyway. However, a weak Romney coming off of two big losses could actually lose states that were either safely with him or fairly safe (Nevada, Maine and Colorado come to mind).
Add to this the fact that the possibility of a long drawn out nomination fight (and possible late entry candidate) could give Paul the balance of power in terms of delegates.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.