Obama's Catholic hospital decision (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:12:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Obama's Catholic hospital decision (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Obama's Catholic hospital decision  (Read 7894 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,426


« on: February 02, 2012, 02:01:15 PM »

This is absolutely asinine, and seriously concerning. What in the world does Obama think anybody gains from this decision? Its only effect is to piss people off.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,426


« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2012, 03:32:18 PM »

It will be a cold day in hell before I ever vote for that man. But then again it's been that way for a long time...

This will be tossed at the Supreme Court.

I sincerely hope it will be thrown out before that, since if Catholic hospitals are seriously considering not providing health coverage to their workers, well...that is really, really, really not good news otherwise.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,426


« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2012, 01:28:40 PM »
« Edited: February 06, 2012, 01:31:17 PM by Nathan »

Never met a Catholic girl who wasn't on the pill.

One of my friends is a Buddhist girl who has in the past gone off on a tangent about how hormonal birth control disagrees with her interpretation of the sutras and throws the body askew of the Middle Way. (Not a hippie Buddhist girl. Her family is Japanese and Korean.)
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,426


« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2012, 09:36:35 PM »
« Edited: February 08, 2012, 09:39:16 PM by Nathan »

Never met a Catholic girl who wasn't on the pill.

One of my friends is a Buddhist girl who has in the past gone off on a tangent about how hormonal birth control disagrees with her interpretation of the sutras and throws the body askew of the Middle Way. (Not a hippie Buddhist girl. Her family is Japanese and Korean.)

Mumbo Jumbo is gibberish in any languange.

What on Earth are you talking about?

Incidentally, her argument isn't bad at all if one accepts the tenets of the Shingon school and takes the fact that the Womb Mandala is named what it is seriously (which, in a highly esoteric and mystical school like Shingon, quite a few people do).
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,426


« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2012, 01:18:15 PM »

At risk of sounding like an idiot, is this new "accomodation" to make the insurance companies provide the birth control actually any different? Wouldn't they just pass the cost on back to the Catholic hospitals?

I might be misunderstanding this, but I think the cost would eventually come back to out-of-pocket. If I'm mistaken, somebody please correct me.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.