Santorum paving the way for Gingrich?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 07:01:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Santorum paving the way for Gingrich?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Santorum paving the way for Gingrich?  (Read 1655 times)
California8429
A-Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,785
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 05, 2012, 05:44:12 PM »

If Santorum wins Minnesota, as many of us expect, and continues to win midwestern states like the Dakotas, Wisconsin, Illinois, maybe even Nebraska, Montana, and Wyoming, he'll have taken those from Romney's column, not Gingrich. Gingrich can meanwhile sweep the south on Super Tuesday and with Santorum and Gingrich both in the race, they'll be competing for different areas with Santorum taking from Romney 08 wins and once thought to be locked areas. Then you have Paul also who could win in Maine, Montana, Alaska, North Dakota which are Romney 08 states.

With everyone staying in the race, this actually could be even worse for Romney than having a single anti-Romney candidate.

Hopefully the maps will be colorful and the convention fun! Cheesy
Logged
Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!
ModernBourbon Democrat
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,300


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2012, 05:45:36 PM »

The absolute best result I can see is Romney managing to lose enough for it to go to a brokered convention, and that requires that all of the three non-Romneys get enough delegates to force it.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2012, 05:56:55 PM »
« Edited: February 05, 2012, 06:01:23 PM by realisticidealist »

Purely from an aesthetics/map standpoint, I'd love to see something like this:

Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2012, 07:44:50 PM »

Purely from an aesthetics/map standpoint, I'd love to see something like this:


Santorum would never win WA, it's between Romney and Paul here.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2012, 07:49:21 PM »

Purely from an aesthetics/map standpoint, I'd love to see something like this:


Santorum would never win WA, it's between Romney and Paul here.

Huckabee probably won here last time. There are a lot more evangelicals in the WSRP than you'd think.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2012, 08:54:14 PM »

Your projections for Santorum are absolutely laughable.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2012, 08:55:51 PM »

Purely from an aesthetics/map standpoint, I'd love to see something like this:


Santorum would never win WA, it's between Romney and Paul here.

Somebody has never ventured into eastern/central Washington. It's filled with evangelicals.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2012, 08:57:50 PM »

Purely from an aesthetics/map standpoint, I'd love to see something like this:


Santorum would never win WA, it's between Romney and Paul here.

Huckabee probably won here last time. There are a lot more evangelicals in the WSRP than you'd think.

Gingrich will probably win Oklahoma.  Although, it'd be close between him and Santorum.  Ron Paul will also get a chunk of the Sooner State votes.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2012, 09:09:35 PM »


Yeah, because I totally said that map was going to happen or even remotely likely... Roll Eyes
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2012, 09:10:54 PM »


Yeah, because I totally said that map was going to happen or even remotely likely... Roll Eyes

SO YOU ADMIT IT.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2012, 09:15:37 PM »

In my case Santorum is certainly paving the way for Gingrich because Santorum is the only one left standing between me becoming a Romney supporter.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,069
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2012, 09:17:43 PM »
« Edited: February 05, 2012, 09:20:48 PM by Torie »


Yeah, because I totally said that map was going to happen or even remotely likely... Roll Eyes

SO YOU ADMIT IT.

He wanted his map to be "aesthetic," and so that meant he gave Rick the Midwest and so forth to achieve what he wanted to print, frame, and put on his wall. He has the bit right that Newt will be leashed to where the slave masters once thrived however - if he gets even that since Newt is having something of a nervous breakdown at the moment. Smiley

Granted, I am not sure how Indiana fits into his aesthetic model ... and Newt ain't going to carry it, particularly if he is losing everything else outside the former cotton is king slave belt.  Tongue
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,144


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2012, 09:28:46 PM »

The apparent failure of the southern anti-Romneys and the northern anti-Romneys to get on the same page, even though they need to do so fast, is one of the more interesting things of this cycle. In some ways it is almost more interesting than Romney vs. Not Romney. There may be some complex issues around regionalism and religion under the surface here that haven't received explicit attention in the campaign.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2012, 09:33:39 PM »


Granted, I am not sure how Indiana fits into his aesthetic model ... and Newt ain't going to carry it, particularly if he is losing everything else outside the former cotton is king slave belt.  Tongue

Santorum's not on the ballot there.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 06, 2012, 03:44:45 AM »

Nah, if he wins MN and the MO pretend primary, then he's paving the way to replace Gingrich as anti-Romney.  The only thing that's being paved for Gingrich is his chance to be elected Moon President:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PsSJYrbuaI
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 06, 2012, 12:00:17 PM »


Granted, I am not sure how Indiana fits into his aesthetic model ... and Newt ain't going to carry it, particularly if he is losing everything else outside the former cotton is king slave belt.  Tongue

Santorum's not on the ballot there.

Thanks to a recent development, he likely will be. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.231 seconds with 13 queries.