Maine results thread.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:10:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Maine results thread.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12
Author Topic: Maine results thread.  (Read 40028 times)
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 09, 2012, 12:06:27 PM »

Might as well start this early.

Here are some early leaked results according to WatchTheVote (Paul supporters who report the vote totals in their precinct, so I can't vouch for its accuracy, but they were the ones who figured out Santorum beat Romney in IA).

Image of the summary if you don't have a Google account:

Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2012, 12:11:20 PM »

Awesome! Assuming turn-out is down from 2008 again (which is likely), that's probably something like 10-20% of the vote already.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2012, 12:53:16 PM »

Looks like I need to change my prediction for Maine to a Romney win.   For obvious reasons, the Paul numbers will be inflated because of the source of which precincts are reported.  The only question is 30% or 40%.
Logged
Rules for me, but not for thee
Dabeav
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,785
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.19, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2012, 01:58:34 PM »

Looks like I need to change my prediction for Maine to a Romney win.   For obvious reasons, the Paul numbers will be inflated because of the source of which precincts are reported.  The only question is 30% or 40%.

Haters gonna hate.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2012, 04:23:38 PM »

Looks like I need to change my prediction for Maine to a Romney win.   For obvious reasons, the Paul numbers will be inflated because of the source of which precincts are reported.  The only question is 30% or 40%.

Haters gonna hate.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2012, 04:40:49 PM »

Not a hater, but there is an obvious self-selection bias at work here that makes the numbers useful for gauging the relative strengths of the other candidates, but will inflate Paul's results.  Paul's only chance of winning Maine would appear to be that the Santorum surge takes more Romney supporters with it than Paul supporters, and that it be large enough to affect the outcome.  The first is likely true, but I am doubtful of the second.  I won't be shocked if Paul takes Maine, but I will be surprised, and pleasantly so.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2012, 08:49:02 PM »

Santorum will probably surge in Saturday's voting. Should be enough to keep the winner under 40%, I hope.

If Paul loses Maine, does he win any state?
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2012, 08:57:27 PM »
« Edited: February 09, 2012, 09:02:54 PM by Lief »

Santorum will probably surge in Saturday's voting. Should be enough to keep the winner under 40%, I hope.

If Paul loses Maine, does he win any state?

WA, AK, and ND remain possibilities. Montana would also be a prime opportunity if it were still a caucus this year. He'll probably get a strong second in Idaho, but the Mormons there should put Mitt over the top.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2012, 08:57:43 PM »

This is happening today?
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2012, 08:58:31 PM »
« Edited: February 09, 2012, 09:00:02 PM by realisticidealist »

Santorum will probably surge in Saturday's voting. Should be enough to keep the winner under 40%, I hope.

If Paul loses Maine, does he win any state?

Won't he have shot in your state? He almost won there in 2008.

He's got a shot, but don't underestimate the WSRP's ability to massage the results. Also, don't underestimate the number of evangelicals in the state party; Robertson won here in 1988 after all.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2012, 09:00:09 PM »

Yeah, they basically cancelled the caucuses in 2008 when it looked like he was going to win, IIRC.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2012, 09:00:29 PM »
« Edited: February 09, 2012, 09:03:49 PM by Eraserhead »


It's been happening over several days. The official results are supposed to be released Saturday.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2012, 09:02:26 PM »


Its been happening over several days. The official results are supposed to be released Saturday.

Well that's interesting.
Logged
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2012, 09:02:47 PM »


It's an ongoing caucus that started I believe last Saturday and ends this Saturday, February 11.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2012, 09:03:29 PM »

It actually started in January and will last until March 3rd in some places, but the straw poll results will be announced Saturday at 7:30 PM EST.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2012, 09:06:15 PM »

He'll probably get a strong second in Idaho, but the Mormons there should put Mitt over the top.

Mormons will probably be a majority of the vote in the Idaho caucus.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2012, 09:09:59 PM »

He'll probably get a strong second in Idaho, but the Mormons there should put Mitt over the top.

Mormons will probably be a majority of the vote in the Idaho caucus.

Yeah, luckily Idaho is proportional, so Paul will still get some delegates at least.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 10, 2012, 12:09:58 AM »


It's an ongoing caucus that started I believe last Saturday and ends this Saturday, February 11.


It actually started in January and will last until March 3rd in some places, but the straw poll results will be announced Saturday at 7:30 PM EST.


They merely encouraged places to vote between last Saturday and this Saturday, but some places didn't follow their advice. If Saturday's result is close, that means that the final actual result could be different.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 10, 2012, 12:24:16 AM »

So far, Paul is doing better in the counties the website's reported that Romney won in 2008.  Although, they may be cherrypicking results, so...
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 10, 2012, 11:28:29 AM »

I'm in DC with my phone, and the reception is terrible, so websites with images kill my battery... Can somebody post an update or a link to the googledoc?
Logged
argentarius
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 843
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 10, 2012, 01:00:40 PM »

I'm in DC with my phone, and the reception is terrible, so websites with images kill my battery... Can somebody post an update or a link to the googledoc?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?authkey=CKT21ZkH&hl=en_US&key=0AjQBwcCtzwG8dEdGUWZjS1FwTW8wTzVyOEJ6dmg4cHc&toomany=true#gid=1

Not much more since the start of the thread. The best thing about Maine is that Paul gets 2 weeks in which he won the last contest if he wins it.
Logged
Rules for me, but not for thee
Dabeav
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,785
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.19, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 10, 2012, 01:05:11 PM »

Speaking of which, Fox News cancelled Freedom Watch.  Could Napolitano be picked for Paul's VP?  I think it would be a good choice.  Or at least get him appointed to the Supreme Court if Paul did pull it all off.
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 10, 2012, 01:30:30 PM »

Speaking of which, Fox News cancelled Freedom Watch.  Could Napolitano be picked for Paul's VP?  I think it would be a good choice.  Or at least get him appointed to the Supreme Court if Paul did pull it all off.

Napolitano is overrated by libertarians.  I like the guy but he's a lightweight judge.
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 10, 2012, 01:43:50 PM »

Speaking of which, Fox News cancelled Freedom Watch.  Could Napolitano be picked for Paul's VP?  I think it would be a good choice. 

Yeah, about as good a choice for VP as John Stossel, Drew Carey, or the guy who pumps my gas.
Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,060


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 10, 2012, 02:31:35 PM »

He'll probably get a strong second in Idaho, but the Mormons there should put Mitt over the top.

Mormons will probably be a majority of the vote in the Idaho caucus.

Yeah, luckily Idaho is proportional, so Paul will still get some delegates at least.

Idaho is Winner Take All if anyone gets over 50% of the national delegates, which IMO is likely given Idaho's system of multiple voting rounds at the county level until one person gets all the county delegates.

http://www.idaho-republican-caucus.com/caucus-rules.html
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 12 queries.