Cannabis '15: The Long Wait Until 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:12:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Cannabis '15: The Long Wait Until 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: Cannabis '15: The Long Wait Until 2016  (Read 49290 times)
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« on: February 10, 2012, 01:17:09 AM »

http://blog.norml.org/2012/02/09/8-states-may-legalize-marijuana-this-year-did-yours-make-the-list/
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2012, 01:37:39 AM »

Colorado initiative might make the ballot after all: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/02/17/regulate-marijuana-like-alcohol-claims-enough-signatures-for-colo-ballot/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2012, 06:13:28 PM »

Colorado initiative does make the ballot:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/27/usa-marijuana-colorado-idINDEE81Q0OR20120227

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2012, 12:38:17 PM »


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Just to clarify, the Cannabis Tax Act initiative needs 87,213 valid signatures while the IP-24 initiative needs 116,284 valid signatures:

* http://egov.sos.state.or.us/elec/web_irr_search.record_detail?p_reference=20120009..LSCYYY.

* http://egov.sos.state.or.us/elec/web_irr_search.record_detail?p_reference=20120024..LSCYYY.

The difference is due to the fact that IP-24 is a constitutional amendment while the Cannabis Tax Act is a statutory initiative and Oregon's signature requirement is based on a specific % of the vote cast in the previous gubernatorial election with a higher % requirement for initiatives that change the constitution: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Laws_governing_the_initiative_process_in_Oregon#Number_required

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

There's a possibility both measures might appear on the ballot but I think IP-24 is more likely as they've already collected ~35k signatures and they started a few months ago while the Cannabis Tax Act initiative has ~42k signatures and they started in early-mid 2011. While I don't like putting things that should be statutory law in the state constitution, I think I will sign IP-24.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2012, 12:57:28 AM »

http://www.alternet.org/drugs/154468/4_marijuana_legalization_initiatives_race_against_the_clock_in_oregon

Talk about not being coordinated... Looks like 2 of those 4 are pretty much dead. The most likely two:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2012, 10:21:20 PM »

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-pot-initiatives-20120310,0,6630706.story

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Angry
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #6 on: April 24, 2012, 01:35:13 PM »


As suspected, none of the initiatives met the signature deadline: http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2012/04/marijuana_legalization_efforts.php

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2012, 05:11:24 PM »

http://blog.norml.org/2012/05/05/connecticut-will-be-17th-state-to-legalize-medical-marijuana/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Governor has said he will sign it I believe: http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2012/05/05/conn_senate_passes_medical_marijuana_bill/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Also:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2012, 04:02:29 AM »

Looks like the Missouri legalization initiative has failed to get enough signatures: http://show-mecannabis.com/important-announcement-from-show-me-cannabis-regulations-board-of-directors-3/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #9 on: May 11, 2012, 04:13:11 AM »

There's a possibility both measures might appear on the ballot but I think IP-24 is more likely as they've already collected ~35k signatures and they started a few months ago while the Cannabis Tax Act initiative has ~42k signatures and they started in early-mid 2011.

Looking likely they'll both make the ballot: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/may092012/legalization-initiatives-mb.php

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Our Attorney General race might have drawn more attention to the issue as Republicans did not field a candidate and one of the two Democrats running in the D primary is running as a "law and order" candidate: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/09/medical-marijuana-oregon-attorney-general-race_n_1503341.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Hopefully Holton loses: http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=19eb906a-ae83-463b-9daa-3c3bda489d7d

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2012, 02:48:01 PM »


About 80% of the vote counted and: http://oregonvotes.org/results/2012P/index.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2012, 05:00:29 PM »
« Edited: May 16, 2012, 05:02:58 PM by greenforest32 »

Sweet. How well do you think the two initiatives will do in the general election?

If they both make the ballot, I think the measure that focuses on removing the penalties (IP-24) will do better than the one that proposes setting up a government controlled distribution system (Cannabis tax act) similar to our alcohol system which itself is not very popular (pretty sure voters would privatize the alcohol system like Washington recently did if there was an initiative that did this while being revenue neutral).

I'm thinking IP-24 could potentially pass in the low to mid 50s with the Cannabis Tax Act probably ranging around 35-45%.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2012, 01:33:06 AM »
« Edited: May 19, 2012, 01:35:48 AM by greenforest32 »

Looking likely they'll both make the ballot

Yup Tongue

http://www.oregonlive.com/mapes/index.ssf/2012/05/two_pro-marijuana_initiatives.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

IP-24:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

OCTA:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.



I am not sure if Gov. Malloy has signed the CT bill yet into law, but assuming he does/has we can put CT up on the big board.

30% - Decriminalized
40% - Medicinal Cannabis allowed
70% - All of the Above

Kind of surprised Maryland and Illinois haven't done anything.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #13 on: May 19, 2012, 02:02:27 AM »


To be honest I've never actually tried it.

I do like to see government policy move in the right direction though
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2012, 11:15:04 PM »

Pretty active year. Rhode Island likely to become the 15th state to decriminalize possession:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/rhode_island/articles/2012/06/08/ri_pot_decriminalization_bill_on_govs_desk/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #15 on: June 13, 2012, 06:04:12 PM »

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/06/13/498675/seven-more-states-may-legalize-medical-marijuana-in-2012/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't see the Missouri, Pennsylvania, New York, and New Hampshire legislatures passing the bill/getting enough votes to override a veto. The Ohio and Massachusetts ballot measures are probably the best bet. Haven't heard much news about the Illinois legislative bill recently. Not sure how that's going to play out.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2012, 01:03:16 AM »

Pretty active year. Rhode Island likely to become the 15th state to decriminalize possession:

Yup, it's official: http://news.providencejournal.com/breaking-news/2012/06/ri-gov-chafee-s-6.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

New York still looking doubtful: http://www.chicagotribune.com/sns-rt-usa-newyorkmarijuanal1e8hdkok-20120613,0,5467172.story

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #17 on: June 20, 2012, 03:22:43 AM »

So much for that: http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2012/jun/19/ny_gop_kills_marijuana_decrimina

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The Washington legalization initiative was polled again too. Polls so far:

The Elway Research (July 2011)[1] - 54% in favor, 43% opposed, 3% undecided
The Elway Research (January 2012)[1] - 48% in favor, 45% opposed, 7% undecided
Public Policy Polling (February 2012)[2] - 47% yes, 39% no, 15% not sure
Public Policy Polling (June 2012)[3] - 50% yes, 37% no, 12% not sure

[1] http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Washington_Marijuana_Legalization_and_Regulation,_Initiative_502_%282012%29#Polls
[2] http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_WA_222.pdf
[3] http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_WA_619.pdf
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2012, 11:53:05 AM »

Yesterday was the signature deadline for Oregon. It'll be a week or two before we know what measures qualified but it looks like IP-24 might not make the ballot after all because the SoS rejected a fairly high percentage of the signatures they turned in earlier. The Cannabis Tax Act has a better chance of making the ballot now I think.

http://news.opb.org/article/q-and-a-rundown-ballot-initiative-campaigns-turned-today/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Also the NH legislature wasn't able to override the Governor's veto of the medical marijuana bill: http://blog.norml.org/2012/06/27/new-hampshire-senate-fails-to-override-governors-medical-marijuana-veto/
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2012, 10:19:54 PM »

The New Jersey house passed a decriminalization measure and it's heading to the senate but Christie has vowed to veto: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/25/new-jersey-assembly-appro_n_1626147.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't think they'll be able to override the veto unfortunately.

Also, the Michigan legalization campaign ends without enough signatures: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/10/michigan-marijuana-legalization-amendment-campaign_n_1662449.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #20 on: July 13, 2012, 11:47:18 PM »

I don't see the Missouri, Pennsylvania, New York, and New Hampshire legislatures passing the bill/getting enough votes to override a veto. The Ohio and Massachusetts ballot measures are probably the best bet. Haven't heard much news about the Illinois legislative bill recently. Not sure how that's going to play out.

1. The Ohio medical marijuana measure didn't make the ballot: http://www.omca2012.org/home/june-announcement

2. The Massachusetts medical marijuana measure did: http://blog.norml.org/2012/07/10/massachusetts-medical-marijuana-initiative-approved-to-go-before-voters-in-november/

3. One of the Oregon legalization initiatives (Cannabis Tax Act) made the ballot while the other (IP-24) did not though they are suing over the methods used to disqualify many of the signatures[a]: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/07/marijuana_legalization_measure.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

[a] http://www.oregonlive.com/mapes/index.ssf/2012/07/marijuana_petitioner_files_law.html
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #21 on: July 23, 2012, 03:16:02 PM »

Unless the Nebraska legalization measure makes it (which seems unlikely), it looks like it's just going to be Washington, Oregon, and Colorado as the Montana legalization campaign ends without enough signatures: http://helenair.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/marijuana-legalization-anti-abortion-personhood-measures-fail-to-make-ballot/article_1cabe85c-d2f1-11e1-a312-001a4bcf887a.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


A bit rich after saying he'll veto a simple decriminalization bill but I guess it's a move in the right direction.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #22 on: July 24, 2012, 09:38:12 PM »

A good breakdown of the WA/OR/CO initiatives: http://nationalcannabiscoalition.com/2012/07/comparing-marijuana-legalization-measures-in-oregon-colorado-and-washington-state/

In case you don't read the WA thread, SUSA says pot legalization is up 23 (yes, 23!) in Washington.

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=2786ebbd-3348-4795-b0a8-0ee124a9707d

Good poll numbers for Washington. Looks to be the most favored to pass so far.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #23 on: July 27, 2012, 02:11:20 AM »

Oregon SoS says the other legalization initiative (IP-24) doesn't have enough signatures: https://twitter.com/oregonelections/status/228536743425630208

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Looks like Arkansas might have a medical marijuana initiative too: http://www.news-leader.com/viewart/20120706/NEWS07/307060083/Arkansas-medical-marijuana-backers-submit-petitions

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

« Reply #24 on: August 18, 2012, 10:30:31 PM »

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2018898246_marijaunaofm11m.html

The state government estimates that legalizing marijuana could bring up to $1.9 billion in revenue to Washington over five years... Shocked

I wonder what makes the Washington measure worth so much more? The Oregon proposal claims to be about $120-150 million annually and the Colorado measure was just scored at a similar number ($60-100m / yr): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/16/legalized-marijuana-could_n_1791448.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

---------------

Also I missed the action in North Dakota. They might have a medical marijuana ballot initiative too: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/ND-likely-to-debate-medical-marijuana-proposal-3766081.php

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 13 queries.