MI: PPP: Santorum leads Romney by 15%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 05:25:47 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  MI: PPP: Santorum leads Romney by 15%
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: MI: PPP: Santorum leads Romney by 15%  (Read 8445 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 13, 2012, 12:45:49 PM »

If Romney doesn't carry Michigan, he's toast.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 13, 2012, 12:48:30 PM »

Database entry: https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2012R/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=2620120212108
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 13, 2012, 12:54:57 PM »

Looks like a new hole is in Rick's future, because Mitt is going to go medieval on him and rip him a new one.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,075
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 13, 2012, 12:55:45 PM »
« Edited: February 13, 2012, 01:18:27 PM by Torie »


I doubt Mittens will carry Michigan, and I doubt he would be toast when he doesn't (particularly if he carries AZ while losing Michigan), so your hypothesis may well be tested. Smiley  MI and OH are not good places for Mitt. MI is kind of horrible for Mittens when you think about it. They may like Santorum's GATT breaking manufacturing industrial policy which is sort of a proxy appealing to those with protectionist impulses (Mittens is more laissez faire), and the Pubs are quite Catholic and Dutch, both groups with which Rick should do quite well. He's been sweeping the Dutch everywhere so far (check out the results in Marion, Sioux and Lyon Counties in Iowa). OH isn't much better. It's light on the Dutch, but has the Butternut region, and a fair number of Mennonites, along with the Catholics. Mittens' path to the nomination will need to come from the NE, the West, and more practical and hardbitten and less ideological places like Indiana and Illinois (with lots of higher income suburban white collar voters). Mittens is fortunate that the way delegates are awarded is skewed heavily in his favor overall.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 13, 2012, 01:04:53 PM »

Yes
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 13, 2012, 01:05:28 PM »

I'd like to see more polling here before believing that Santorum is really up this much, given that PPP also sees Santorum way up nationally and Gallup doesn't.  Is PPP seeing Santorum surge much more than he really is, or is it real?
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 13, 2012, 01:07:14 PM »

Mitt minus MI and PA - the NE + West coast + FL isn't enough to outright win the nomination.

Romney needs two of the following: WI, IL, MI, OH, IN, PA, VA.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 13, 2012, 01:16:45 PM »

Mitt minus MI and PA - the NE + West coast + FL isn't enough to outright win the nomination.

Romney needs two of the following: WI, IL, MI, OH, IN, PA, VA.

Well he'll easily carry Virginia.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 13, 2012, 01:34:32 PM »

If he loses in MI? Things might change again.
Logged
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 13, 2012, 01:35:58 PM »

This is like what happened after Newt won South Carolina. I'm confident Romney will win Michigan.
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 13, 2012, 01:48:09 PM »


I doubt Mittens will carry Michigan, and I doubt he would be toast when he doesn't (particularly if he carries AZ while losing Michigan), so your hypothesis may well be tested. Smiley  MI and OH are not good places for Mitt. MI is kind of horrible for Mittens when you think about it. They may like Santorum's GATT breaking manufacturing industrial policy which is sort of a proxy appealing to those with protectionist impulses (Mittens is more laissez faire), and the Pubs are quite Catholic and Dutch, both groups with which Rick should do quite well. He's been sweeping the Dutch everywhere so far (check out the results in Marion, Sioux and Lyon Counties in Iowa). OH isn't much better. It's light on the Dutch, but has the Butternut region, and a fair number of Mennonites, along with the Catholics. Mittens' path to the nomination will need to come from the NE, the West, and more practical and hardbitten and less ideological places like Indiana and Illinois (with lots of higher income suburban white collar voters). Mittens is fortunate that the way delegates are awarded is skewed heavily in his favor overall.
So what makes you think Mitt is electable? If he has issues with Ohio he won't win the White House...
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,075
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 13, 2012, 01:49:28 PM »


I doubt Mittens will carry Michigan, and I doubt he would be toast when he doesn't (particularly if he carries AZ while losing Michigan), so your hypothesis may well be tested. Smiley  MI and OH are not good places for Mitt. MI is kind of horrible for Mittens when you think about it. They may like Santorum's GATT breaking manufacturing industrial policy which is sort of a proxy appealing to those with protectionist impulses (Mittens is more laissez faire), and the Pubs are quite Catholic and Dutch, both groups with which Rick should do quite well. He's been sweeping the Dutch everywhere so far (check out the results in Marion, Sioux and Lyon Counties in Iowa). OH isn't much better. It's light on the Dutch, but has the Butternut region, and a fair number of Mennonites, along with the Catholics. Mittens' path to the nomination will need to come from the NE, the West, and more practical and hardbitten and less ideological places like Indiana and Illinois (with lots of higher income suburban white collar voters). Mittens is fortunate that the way delegates are awarded is skewed heavily in his favor overall.
So what makes you think Mitt is electable? If he has issues with Ohio he won't win the White House...

Primaries are very different beasts from General elections.
Logged
Nhoj
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,224
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.52, S: -7.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 13, 2012, 01:52:10 PM »

If he loses in MI? Things might change again.
its doubtful paul could actually beat him there being as hes the only other person on the ballot in VA.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 13, 2012, 02:49:11 PM »

If Romney doesn't win both MI and Ohio, he is in trouble. If he looses both, it is hard to see how he becomes the nominee.


@Torie
Romney can't keep running away from adversarial demographics. He has to find a way to get these people to want to vote for him, or he is finished.
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 13, 2012, 04:26:29 PM »

If Romney doesn't win both MI and Ohio, he is in trouble. If he looses both, it is hard to see how he becomes the nominee.

I think the most likely outcome in this case, barring a total Mittplosion, is that Romney wins the nomination via delegate math despite losing most states and falling short in the national popular vote.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 13, 2012, 04:42:49 PM »

It's about time they finally released this poll, it feels like they teased it forever. I'm not sure if I buy Santorum doing better with Democrats/Independents than registered Republicans though.

If Romney doesn't win both MI and Ohio, he is in trouble. If he looses both, it is hard to see how he becomes the nominee.

Talk to Barack Obama. Wink
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 13, 2012, 07:36:58 PM »


Newt still has a chance in Georgia.  In person early voting started there today, and that by mail started a couple weeks ago.  If Rick can beat Newt in Georgia, I expect Newt to exit the race.  I wish he would exit sooner.  I can't see him making another comeback, so staying in only helps Romney while hurting the already slim GOP prospects in the fall.
Logged
Svensson
NVTownsend
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 630


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 13, 2012, 08:23:27 PM »

You know what? I hope Santorum wins. Even though I support him, I'll freely admit that Paul doesn't have a chance in flip, and Gingrich is so far past his expiration date it's not even funny, so the least the Republican Party can do is nominate someone who isn't an opportunistic shrew. Plus, hey, Santorum provides unintentional comedy by the day and is, frankly, far less superficial than Mitt-3PO.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 14, 2012, 09:49:21 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

FTFY.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 14, 2012, 09:52:42 AM »

Rasmussen will release a new MI poll today.
Logged
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,211
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: February 14, 2012, 01:50:22 PM »

Rasmussen will release a new MI poll today.

[Awaits eagarly]  Shocked
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 13 queries.