The "PPP leaks stuff about their polls" thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 09:31:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The "PPP leaks stuff about their polls" thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15
Author Topic: The "PPP leaks stuff about their polls" thread  (Read 44445 times)
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: March 22, 2012, 08:03:05 PM »

Mr. Inevitable
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: March 22, 2012, 10:02:02 PM »

Santorum - 42%
Romney - 28%
Gingrich - 18%
Paul - 8%
Roemer - 2%

Bam.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: March 22, 2012, 11:07:29 PM »

Drew Brees has a 94%-1% approval rating among likely LA primary voters, breaking the previous record (Abraham Lincoln at 91%-2%)
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: March 23, 2012, 12:42:20 AM »

One last note before I go to bed- Santorum with a big lead in Nebraska where we went in the field tonight. No surprise.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,613
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: March 23, 2012, 01:16:22 AM »

One last note before I go to bed- Santorum with a big lead in Nebraska where we went in the field tonight. No surprise.

No way! John King said the other day that its impossible for Santorum to win in Nebraska.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: March 23, 2012, 01:52:10 AM »



We all know how this is all going to end...
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: March 23, 2012, 01:59:51 AM »



We all know how this is all going to end...

I think Wisconsin and North Carolina could both go either way. But yeah, pretty much.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: March 23, 2012, 02:04:17 AM »

Montana and Indiana are not Romney-states ... yet.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: March 23, 2012, 02:08:55 AM »

I wonder if Ron Paul will make some kind of an effort in Montana even though it's a primary this time instead of a caucus.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: March 23, 2012, 02:13:51 AM »

I wonder if Ron Paul will make some kind of an effort in Montana even though it's a primary this time instead of a caucus.

Ron Paul's best days of the campaign are behind him already.

With "effort", do you mean he aims for 12% instead of his recent 4-9% ?

The guy should drop out and Newt should follow him.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,613
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: March 23, 2012, 02:18:18 AM »

Delaware might be fertile ground for Santorum too.

Montana and Indiana are not Romney-states ... yet.

Does anyone know which part of Montana has more sway in a Republican primary? The eastern half, which resembles closely the Dakotas, will be Rick country. If it can outvote the more populous but more Democratic western half then Santorum will be the favorite.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: March 23, 2012, 02:20:26 AM »

Delaware might be fertile ground for Santorum too.

I'm not sure about that: many bankers and rich people there.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,613
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: March 23, 2012, 02:26:32 AM »

Delaware might be fertile ground for Santorum too.

I'm not sure about that: many bankers and rich people there.

And many hicks downstate. These are the same people who chose to throw away a Senate seat by choosing a witch over a pillar of the state's political life.

And don't forget that he must be well known (and I assume respected) since they share the Philadelphia media market.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: March 23, 2012, 02:28:32 AM »

Delaware might be fertile ground for Santorum too.

I'm not sure about that: many bankers and rich people there.

And many hicks downstate. These are the same people who chose to throw away a Senate seat by choosing a witch over a pillar of the state's political life.

On the other hand, Delaware's 2008 primary result mirrored the one in Illinois.

And we know how the IL primary ended this week.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,613
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: March 23, 2012, 02:49:51 AM »

On the other hand, Delaware's 2008 primary result mirrored the one in Illinois.

And we know how the IL primary ended this week.

McCain's vote both in Illinois and Delaware was pretty homogenous. He didn't have a glaring problem with downscale voters and his military record made him a much better fit for rural areas, where Romney gets killed everytime.
Again, it's a matter of numbers. If Wilmington and subs can outvote the downstate the Mittens wins. If not then Rick wins.  
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,867
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: March 23, 2012, 02:51:10 AM »
« Edited: March 23, 2012, 02:54:52 AM by Alcon »

In 2008, a little under half of Republican votes came from New Castle County, compared to about seven-tenths of Democratic votes.

Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: March 23, 2012, 04:03:33 AM »



We all know how this is all going to end...

I want to believe otherwise but based on what? Especially not with Newt sticking around this long.

They built up all this suspense only to let the show come to a long, incrementally disappointing close.

Lame
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: March 23, 2012, 05:31:56 AM »

Drew Brees has a 94%-1% approval rating among likely LA primary voters, breaking the previous record (Abraham Lincoln at 91%-2%)

Favorability, not approval.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: March 23, 2012, 08:01:08 AM »

Santorum - 42%
Romney - 28%
Gingrich - 18%
Paul - 8%
Roemer - 2%

Bam.

Statewide, that translate into 11 Santorum, 9 Romney.  With the CD's assuming Romney comes in third in two (and that really pushing it), Santorum 12, Romney 4, Gingrich 2.  Best case scenario, Rick gains 10 delegates.
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: March 23, 2012, 08:28:22 AM »

Santorum - 42%
Romney - 28%
Gingrich - 18%
Paul - 8%
Roemer - 2%

Bam.

Statewide, that translate into 11 Santorum, 9 Romney.  With the CD's assuming Romney comes in third in two (and that really pushing it), Santorum 12, Romney 4, Gingrich 2.  Best case scenario, Rick gains 10 delegates.

The delegates by CD are allocated by the caucus process (starting in late April); only 20 At-Large delegates are related to the results of the primary.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: March 23, 2012, 08:36:30 AM »

Santorum - 42%
Romney - 28%
Gingrich - 18%
Paul - 8%
Roemer - 2%

Bam.

Statewide, that translate into 11 Santorum, 9 Romney.  With the CD's assuming Romney comes in third in two (and that really pushing it), Santorum 12, Romney 4, Gingrich 2.  Best case scenario, Rick gains 10 delegates.

Wrong, like usual. It's 12-8 for Rick.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #146 on: March 23, 2012, 08:38:02 AM »

Santorum - 42%
Romney - 28%
Gingrich - 18%
Paul - 8%
Roemer - 2%

Bam.

Statewide, that translate into 11 Santorum, 9 Romney.  With the CD's assuming Romney comes in third in two (and that really pushing it), Santorum 12, Romney 4, Gingrich 2.  Best case scenario, Rick gains 10 delegates.

The delegates by CD are allocated by the caucus process (starting in late April); only 20 At-Large delegates are related to the results of the primary.

That will translate into a 2 delegate lead.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #147 on: March 23, 2012, 08:41:49 AM »

Santorum - 42%
Romney - 28%
Gingrich - 18%
Paul - 8%
Roemer - 2%

Bam.

Statewide, that translate into 11 Santorum, 9 Romney.  With the CD's assuming Romney comes in third in two (and that really pushing it), Santorum 12, Romney 4, Gingrich 2.  Best case scenario, Rick gains 10 delegates.

Wrong, like usual. It's 12-8 for Rick.

Yes, four delegate lead for Santorum.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #148 on: March 23, 2012, 08:45:31 AM »

Santorum - 42%
Romney - 28%
Gingrich - 18%
Paul - 8%
Roemer - 2%

Bam.

Statewide, that translate into 11 Santorum, 9 Romney.  With the CD's assuming Romney comes in third in two (and that really pushing it), Santorum 12, Romney 4, Gingrich 2.  Best case scenario, Rick gains 10 delegates.

Wrong, like usual. It's 12-8 for Rick.

Yes, four delegate lead for Santorum.

Ok, J.J., you clearly stated Romney would receive nine delegates. In the correct breakdown, it's 12-8, not 11-9.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #149 on: March 23, 2012, 09:03:38 AM »

Santorum - 42%
Romney - 28%
Gingrich - 18%
Paul - 8%
Roemer - 2%

Bam.

Statewide, that translate into 11 Santorum, 9 Romney.  With the CD's assuming Romney comes in third in two (and that really pushing it), Santorum 12, Romney 4, Gingrich 2.  Best case scenario, Rick gains 10 delegates.

Wrong, like usual. It's 12-8 for Rick.

Yes, four delegate lead for Santorum.

Ok, J.J., you clearly stated Romney would receive nine delegates. In the correct breakdown, it's 12-8, not 11-9.

Yes, and I corrected that, agreeing with you, 4 delegates, based on those number, a 12-8 split.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 13 queries.