Washington GOP caucus **results thread** (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:14:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Washington GOP caucus **results thread** (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Washington GOP caucus **results thread**  (Read 17080 times)
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« on: March 03, 2012, 12:26:21 PM »

I had a dream that Newt Gingrich won, complete with a legislative district map.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2012, 12:47:29 PM »

I'm kind of tempted to go just because it's probably the only chance to see my precinct's result. But I wouldn't want to vote, just watch! Tongue
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2012, 12:50:21 PM »

I'm kind of tempted to go just because it's probably the only chance to see my precinct's result. But I wouldn't want to vote, just watch! Tongue

Before the WA-GOP "adjusts" the result, you mean?

Of course. Part of the adjustment is making detailed results unavailable. Sad
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2012, 12:58:15 PM »

Apparently someone sent out a robocall saying the caucuses were cancelled. No idea who it is/who was targeted.

So we're already out-shenaniganing the other caucuses. Before voting even starts. Take that, Nevada!
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2012, 03:05:36 PM »

Unofficial results of the combined caucus at the school I was at: 96 santorum, 89 Romney, 68 Paul, 36 Gingrich.

Is this Snohomish County or Cheney?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2012, 03:12:11 PM »

The results I'm seeing on Twitter look good for Romney.

Eastern Seattle suburbs "heavy for Romney"

Lakwood HS, Marysville: Santorum 96, Romney 89, Paul 68, Gingrich 36

Garfield City, Whitman County: Romney 24, Santorum 23, Gingrich 6, Paul 4

Reports from Tri-Cities of strong Romney support, little Santorum

Selah caucus in Yakima County split between Romney and Santorum

Mill Creek seems Romney/Paul split with some Gingrich and Santorum supporters

Ugh, yeah... That sounds like a Romney win. I always regret being brave and bold with my predictions.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2012, 03:17:50 PM »

David Irons says Romney got 60-70% in Sammamish.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2012, 03:22:40 PM »

Yeah, this looks over already. Hopefully I'm wrong. Losing 2 points in my own state, how embarrassing.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2012, 03:29:20 PM »

Redmond looking like another Romney win.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2012, 04:03:04 PM »

Redmond: Romney 133, Paul 109, Santorum 45, Gingrich 21, undecided 6, Colbert 1.

Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2012, 04:18:21 PM »

Heritage HS (Vancouver): Paul at 200, Romney 188, santorum 147, 46 Gingrich, 15 undecided

Bremerton: Split between Romney and Paul, poor showing by Santorum
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #11 on: March 03, 2012, 05:55:44 PM »

We're getting reports of delegates from some areas, and actual voters from others. I'm guessing that explains much of the discrepancy.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #12 on: March 03, 2012, 06:18:13 PM »
« Edited: March 03, 2012, 06:26:55 PM by bgwah »

Here's my map from 2008, for reference:

Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #13 on: March 03, 2012, 06:19:57 PM »

^ It's possible some of the numbers are out of date... Do you have a source?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #14 on: March 03, 2012, 06:27:43 PM »

Okay, I've updated Pacific and Klickitat's percentage.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2012, 06:49:44 PM »
« Edited: March 03, 2012, 07:44:05 PM by bgwah »

Starting the Atlas-style map:

Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2012, 06:58:03 PM »

G=Gingrich
R=Romney
P=Paul
S=Santorum
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2012, 07:44:15 PM »


updated
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2012, 07:47:22 PM »

The % reporting is probably inaccurate. King County has small precincts (and a lot less Republicans), distorting the number a bit.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2012, 09:22:22 PM »

Whatcom for Santorum. lol Lynden.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #20 on: March 03, 2012, 09:28:48 PM »

ARGH!!!!!!!!

I knew I should've gone with Romney!  Damnit!

Yeah, oh well. I'll just stick the polls from now on. Sad
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #21 on: March 03, 2012, 09:41:54 PM »

ARGH!!!!!!!!

I knew I should've gone with Romney!  Damnit!

Yeah, oh well. I'll just stick the polls from now on. Sad

I did that and it screwed me out of Colorado though, and Santorum did better than the polls in Iowa, so I was confident in the add 7% or so to Santorum's poll numbers and you'll be safe method, but apparently that's not so good afte all. Tongue

You can still use polls to determine who has the momentum. Santorum had the momentum going into Iowa, hence my >20% Santorum prediction. Polling showed us momentum was going to Romney hard in WA and I ignored it.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #22 on: March 03, 2012, 09:55:26 PM »
« Edited: March 03, 2012, 09:57:09 PM by bgwah »

OK, trying to answer my own question on Mormons.....

This map:

link

claims to show the %age of people in (nearly) each county in the USA who are Mormon.  Not a perfect correlation, but those southeastern counties where Romney is winning big seem to be the most Mormon.  The most Mormon county in the state is Adams, and Romney has a whopping 58% of the vote there (which I think might be his highest %age in the state).  So I presume that explains the divide between northeastern and southeastern Washington.


Sorry for answering sooner, but yes, that's largely correct.

Another big boost for Romney in that area stems from the fact that much of it is majority Hispanic. Adams County is 59% Hispanic, much of it recently established (still mostly immigrants and/or under 18). So 13% Mormon is probably something like 1/4th or 1/3rd of the voting eligible population. And then of course an even higher proportion of Republicans, and even higher proportion of people who would bother to go to a caucus.
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #23 on: March 04, 2012, 12:42:04 AM »

I forget if this has been confirmed --- are they using old or new districts?
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

« Reply #24 on: March 04, 2012, 02:13:46 AM »

Does anyone remember what turnout was in the 2008 Democratic caucus? The official numbers we have on Atlas are delegate totals, not turnout.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 14 queries.