Boxers or Briefs by party (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:44:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Boxers or Briefs by party (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Boxers or Briefs?
#1
Briefs - Republican
 
#2
Briefs - Democrat
 
#3
Briefs - other
 
#4
Boxers - Republican
 
#5
Boxers - Democrat
 
#6
Boxers - other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 63

Author Topic: Boxers or Briefs by party  (Read 8924 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,343
United States


« on: March 07, 2012, 08:48:18 PM »

Boxers obviously. Gotta let them breathe.

Agreed, but if you are working out of something you need some support for the frank and beans. Boxers also tend to ride up while exercising.  In this scenario, boxer briefs are the preferable option.
Indeed.  You can't do ....things...in boxers.  If you're just sitting on your ass, bitching about things, sure, boxers FTW.  But if you like, move and stuff, boxers suck.

I don't know why boxer-briefs never make these polls.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,343
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2012, 11:44:38 PM »

What about the military and their absentee ballets?  I know for a fact that everybody in basic wears tighty whities because they make you.  They take your civies (including your undies) first night and issue you several pairs of drawers.  EVERYbody was smuggling plums.  I fought jock itch (or something) for most of my 7 weeks in basic because of those snug and overly bleached underwear.  It was much worse than the pushups or the yelling.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.