Chicago-Tribune: Romney +4 in Illinois
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 08:40:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  Chicago-Tribune: Romney +4 in Illinois
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Chicago-Tribune: Romney +4 in Illinois  (Read 1778 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,876


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 11, 2012, 01:38:24 AM »

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-illinois-poll-20120311,0,1617767.story

Romney 35%
Santorum 31%
Gingrich 12%
Paul 7%
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,175
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2012, 01:39:16 AM »
« Edited: March 11, 2012, 01:40:48 AM by Senator Scott »

Looks like something that can be easily changed with some Santorum or Gingrich victories in MS and AL.

I'd expect a completely orange map with a spot of green on the northeastern part of the state.
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2012, 01:59:36 AM »

A week of Romney Superpac ads should clinch this for Mittens.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,876


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2012, 02:01:07 AM »

And Gingrich winning MS and AL on Tuesday should see him surge and eat away at Santorum. Safe Romney.
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2012, 02:26:17 AM »

Clearly, Romney is either +4 in IL, or +8 in MS. He isn't both.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,876


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2012, 02:28:32 AM »

Clearly, Romney is either +4 in IL, or +8 in MS. He isn't both.

Any poll showing Mitt Romney above 30% in MS or AL is bull, IMO. Those states are hard to poll and it's likely that he's over-polling in both of them at the moment.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,028
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2012, 02:51:38 AM »

Database entry: https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2012R/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=1720120309126
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2012, 05:08:33 AM »

This is what I anticipate as Romney's bare minimum in Illinois. If he didn't lose Ohio or Michigan, which seem less favorable to him, he won't be losing the CHI-suburb dominated IL-GOP this year.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2012, 05:11:26 AM »

Depends a little on the results in Missibama, but if Gingrich does well there he'll probably eat into Santorum in Illinois, which means Romney wins by 5-10% in the end.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,965
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2012, 05:28:09 AM »

Chicago Tribune ?

This Chicago Tribune ?



Great news for Santorum ! Grin
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2012, 05:46:46 AM »

Too early and it is a newspaper poll.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2012, 06:26:06 AM »

At least it's close (for now). I guess Willard will have to spend his ass off yet again.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2012, 06:45:59 AM »

And Gingrich winning MS and AL on Tuesday should see him surge and eat away at Santorum. Safe Romney.

Somewhat, but don't overlook MO.  It is assigning delegates before IL.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,563
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2012, 11:13:19 AM »

flicker of light somewhere in the cave.  now it is our job to locate it.
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2012, 11:22:45 AM »

If the Democratic primary of 2008 is any guide, we may be entering a phase largely devoid of momentum for either candidate, where they each win and lose on the basis of existing demographic categories of support rather than building strength from one primary to the next.
Logged
I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2012, 11:31:33 AM »

lol
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2012, 11:39:48 AM »

Taken after Tuesday but before yesterday's result? Perfect. Sadly, though, Newt is still doing his damage...
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2012, 01:37:07 PM »

Taken after Tuesday but before yesterday's result? Perfect. Sadly, though, Newt is still doing his damage...

Gingrich may have dropped out by that point.  IL is too far out.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 16 queries.