MO-Rasmussen: Sen. McCaskill (D) trails by double-digits (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 06:15:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-Rasmussen: Sen. McCaskill (D) trails by double-digits (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-Rasmussen: Sen. McCaskill (D) trails by double-digits  (Read 2725 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« on: March 16, 2012, 08:43:48 AM »

51% - Sarah Steelman (R)
41% - Claire McCaskill (D)

50% - Todd Akin (R)
43% - Claire McCaskill (D)

49% - John Brunner (R)
42% - Claire McCaskill (D)

47% - Tom Schweich (R)
43% - Claire McCaskill (D)

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_senate_elections/missouri/election_2012_missouri_senate
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2012, 08:45:14 AM »

It looks like Rasmussen and PPP are polling 2 different USA's.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2012, 11:26:35 AM »

Dude, look: The stuff you post here is wrong. Some polls are ages old and not the last ones taken in the race and some polls are missing, like in Hawaii where PPP had an accurate poll and Rasmussen blew the race by more than 30 points.

If you want a real analysis, look at Nate Silver's - who found Rasmussen to be the most biased and inaccurate in 2010, by using only the last polls and not polls that were done 3 months ahead of the election.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,156
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2012, 11:54:27 AM »

I guess you like to cherry pick facts, which is your perogative of course. It allows you to ignore the last PPP polls from states like South Carolina and New York, where they were off twice!

Shrug.

NY was a bit off, but the poll was from early October, when other polls showed a small lead too.

The SC poll is from MAY:

https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2010/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=45302010523108
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 15 queries.