A question to Romney supporters (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:54:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  A question to Romney supporters (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: A question to Romney supporters  (Read 2977 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,066
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: March 21, 2012, 07:25:01 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That assumption is errant - with the possible exception of NH this time, which Mittens is far better positioned to win than the other guys. 
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,066
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2012, 09:33:27 PM »

If Romney carries all the states that went for Bush in 2000 AND 2004 (so that doesn't include NM, IA or NH) he ends up with 281, which means he can drop NV or CO and still win

How's he polling with hispanics compared to Bush? Colorado and Nevada aren't all that viable for Mitt.

The problem with the thread is that it only mentions one state.

The short answer is that in order to get from here to 51%, Romney has to (among other things for sure) pull a rabbit out of his hat with Hispanics. He also has to pull a neat trick of winning border hawks while simultaneously winning Hispanics. He did this successfully in Florida and probably NV (sample was too small to be measured in the exit poll). This began to come apart in Arizona against Rick Santorum, who did better amongst hispanics despite being more hawkish on the border. If anyon can walk a tight rope of nuance in this race, it is Romney. He is also the most likely to stumble while doing it thanks to a gaffe and look completely transparent as well.

That is why in a chose election, but for AZ, I assume Mittens will lose all the states with substantial numbers of Hispanics that are otherwise close, with Florida being a special case with the Cubans, and for that matter, a lot of other non-Mexican Hispanics.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,066
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2012, 12:24:11 PM »

With the GOP's lose of New Mexico and NM's related demographics, Mitt Romney's path to 270 involves winning states that haven't voted for a Republican since 1988.

So, what kind've person would vote for Mitt Romney after not voting for H.W. 92, Dole, Bush 00, Bush 04 or John McCain? Why is Mitt Romney a better candidate than those guys?

Because of his opposition, both on electability and fitness grounds. Period. And the only state Romney needs to win that has not gone Pub since 1988 is NH. And Obama 2012 is not Obama 2008, nor Clinton. The end.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.