Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:08:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?
#1
yes (D)		  
#2
no (D)		  
#3
yes (R)		  
#4
no (R)		  
#5
yes (I)		  
#6
no (I)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?  (Read 1826 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,338
United States


« on: March 24, 2012, 03:28:04 AM »
link
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Seems unfair and racist (in a dog way) to me.  I've known good pit bulls (most of 'em) and scary pit bulls (one of 'em) just like I've known good...say, white people (most of 'em) and scary white people (more than one of 'em).
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,338
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2012, 05:36:05 AM »
Would "breedist" be better?

(or are you making a subtle comment about it being racist because such laws tend to affect hispanics and blacks more than crackers?)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.