Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:15:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?
#1
yes (D)
 
#2
no (D)
 
#3
yes (R)
 
#4
no (R)
 
#5
yes (I)
 
#6
no (I)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?  (Read 1819 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


« on: March 25, 2012, 12:15:54 AM »

I can't speak for rottweilers as a whole, but I grew up with a rottweiler who was the sweetest, most loving, most joyful dog you could ever hope to meet.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2012, 03:05:39 AM »

I can't speak for rottweilers as a whole, but I grew up with a rottweiler who was the sweetest, most loving, most joyful dog you could ever hope to meet.

Aye, I recall a neighbor having a rottweiler before one my moves and she pretty much matched that description! Incidentally, the most aggressive dog I've met happened to be a chihuahua. xD

See, that's the other thing: My uncle has a chihuahua who does not yap very much. NATURALLY.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 15 queries.