Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 25, 2024, 12:53:11 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)

Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?

#1 yes (D)		2 (7.4%)
#2 no (D)		5 (18.5%)
#3 yes (R)		3 (11.1%)
#4 no (R)		4 (14.8%)
#5 yes (I)		7 (25.9%)
#6 no (I)		6 (22.2%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author

Topic: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (Read 1817 times)

Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 38,356

Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Re: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?

« on: March 24, 2012, 10:19:01 AM »

Yeah, it's basically "racist" if that's the term we're using.

We don't have laws that label particular human races as dangerous, because that would cause mass public hysteria, so why have laws that label certain dogs as dangerous?

Logged