Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 13, 2018, 08:12:25 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: New features added! Click here for more information. Click here to configure new features.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Individual Politics (Moderators: Torie, AndrewTX, Associate Justice PiT)
| | |-+  Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (search mode)
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?
yes (D)   -2 (7.4%)
no (D)   -5 (18.5%)
yes (R)   -3 (11.1%)
no (R)   -4 (14.8%)
yes (I)   -7 (25.9%)
no (I)   -6 (22.2%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?  (Read 1272 times)
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35,747
United States


View Profile WWW
« on: March 28, 2012, 06:11:18 pm »

There are some breeds of dogs that are tamer than others, but as a general rule the various breeds of Canis familiaris are sufficiently similar that laws differentiating between them are generally more trouble than they are worth.  However, laws restricting ownership of wild canine species or hybrids between domesticated dogs and and coyotes, dingos, jackals, and/or wolves definitely are a good idea.
Logged

Quote from: Ignatius of Antioch
He that possesses the word of Jesus, is truly able to bear his very silence. Epistle to the Ephesians 3:21a
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
Pages: [1] Print 
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines