Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 07:34:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?
#1
yes (D)
 
#2
no (D)
 
#3
yes (R)
 
#4
no (R)
 
#5
yes (I)
 
#6
no (I)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Are breed based "dangerous dog laws" EVER a good idea?  (Read 1809 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


« on: March 28, 2012, 06:11:18 PM »

There are some breeds of dogs that are tamer than others, but as a general rule the various breeds of Canis familiaris are sufficiently similar that laws differentiating between them are generally more trouble than they are worth.  However, laws restricting ownership of wild canine species or hybrids between domesticated dogs and and coyotes, dingos, jackals, and/or wolves definitely are a good idea.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.