What do you think ?

[Tender Branson]

If not now, when ?

So for me, yes for both of them.

[Adam Griffin]

I'd say from a tactical standpoint, Gingrich is the only one that needs to drop out. Paul supporters are not going to support any other candidate.

From a logical standpoint, they both need to drop out as neither are going to win and they can keep their pledged delegates and decide how to use them come convention time.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Paul has nothing to lose, and has a chance of taking the nomination or changing the platform with his ninjas. Newt has nothing. Newt should (but wont) drop out.

[greenforest32]

Yes, they are the Romney enablers at this point.

[argentarius]

I don't see it. Why should either of these guys drop out? For both of them it's their last act in politics, Gingrich is making a lot of money off this cycle and Ron Paul is spreading a message. They have nothing to lose. Neither should be an option.

[Kung Fu Kenny]

Neither should. I'd love to see a Brokered Convention.

[Torie]

Are you guys really sure that you want Newt to drop out?  



Anyway, I changed my mind. It's time for Newt to go. Of course, he won't be going anywhere.

[Cobbler]

Only Newt really. Ron Paul won't win, but he has other reasons for being in the race as well. Newt is basically still in because he's too stubborn to quit; there is not a path for him.

[Stranger in a strange land]

Neither should. I'd love to see a Brokered Convention.

[California8429]

Both. Though I'd love to see a brokered convention since we're going to lose November at this point.

Paul supporters won't likely back another candidate, but he's already sleeping with Mitt so I don't see the point.