Catholic Institutions Contraception Mandate
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 10:37:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Catholic Institutions Contraception Mandate
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Catholic Institutions Contraception Mandate  (Read 840 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 28, 2012, 12:29:19 AM »

I thought about this while on a panel tonight: Couldn't Bob Jones University v. United States be used as a precedent to say that Catholic institutions receiving federal money have to play by federal rules, meaning that if the federal government wants to mandate contraception being covered by insuracne companies, religious institutions receiving federal money would have to go along with it?

If I'm wrong, I'd really like to know, so I'm curious what our legal experts feel on this issue.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2012, 09:52:21 AM »

Unless I'm mistaken, not all Catholic institutions receive Federal monies, whereas the contraception mandate affects all them regardless of whether they do or not.  Hence the BJU case doesn't serve as a model for this particular issue without some new law being passed by Congress.  Incidentally, being beholden to Federal funds is precisely why a number of religious institutions were not happy about W's faith-based initiatives.  They were concerned that if they became dependent upon them to do their work, a future administration would do something similar to what you proposed.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2012, 02:51:22 PM »

Unless I'm mistaken, not all Catholic institutions receive Federal monies, whereas the contraception mandate affects all them regardless of whether they do or not.  Hence the BJU case doesn't serve as a model for this particular issue without some new law being passed by Congress.  Incidentally, being beholden to Federal funds is precisely why a number of religious institutions were not happy about W's faith-based initiatives.  They were concerned that if they became dependent upon them to do their work, a future administration would do something similar to what you proposed.

Right - I'm just talking about those which do receive Catholic money (which many of them receive some).  But for those that do, is my interpretation of BJU v. US sound?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2012, 05:43:52 PM »

While I didn't explicitly say so, I thought it was fairly clear in my previous reply that I thought the approach you mentioned would work.  About the only way it would fail to work would be if to obtain the desired funds the religious institutions were required to do things that areligious institutions were not required to do.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.