The Republican Vice-Presidential Spectulation Thread. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:21:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Republican Vice-Presidential Spectulation Thread. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Republican Vice-Presidential Spectulation Thread.  (Read 20274 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« on: March 30, 2012, 08:13:18 PM »

McDonnell or Jindal, preferably Jindal.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2012, 09:56:53 PM »

DeMint will not take it, nor would Romney offer. He's always preferred being King of the Teepers. I think Romney's shortlist includes McDonnell, Jindal, Ryan and Portman myself. Perhaps Rubio gets the keynote.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2012, 01:15:35 PM »

Heilemann's take.

http://nymag.com/news/politics/powergrid/romney-running-mate-heilemann-2012-4/
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2012, 12:37:38 PM »

Except I'm not sure if Jindal could really pull off that good convention speech. He's not exactly very charismatic.

And come to think of it he did endorse Rick Perry, although I'm not sure there is any real bad blood there. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think Jindal ever really came out swinging at Romney.

He winked at Romney quite often (constant references to business and gubernatorial experience when asked about his preferences in a candidate) until Perry got in.

Ryan: I wouldn't at all be surprised if he made the final 2.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2012, 02:54:47 PM »

Jindal is disqualified by being a governor.  Romney will not be helped by having a second governor on the ticket.

Depends if Mittens wants to follow the "double up" (Obama/Biden, Dole/Kemp, Kerry/Edwards) model or "complimentary" (Clinton/Gore, GHWB/Quayle, Carter/Mondale) model. The former would (IMO) point towards McDonnell or Jindal, the latter Ryan.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2012, 04:03:25 PM »

Name recognition to a p, I see.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2012, 06:15:15 PM »

Rubio doesn't want it. Rice doesn't either. I'm still predicting it will be Jindal or Ryan.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2012, 04:58:06 PM »

On the scale of 1 to 10, how grumpy would the conservatives get if Romney picked someone who was pro-choice?

12. Romney has said pro-choicers are not even being considered.

Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2012, 08:22:25 PM »

Speaking of Rubio, he's delivering a foreign policy speech at Brookings tomorrow. Jindal keynoted an NY event last week and interspersed talking education and taking hard shots at Obama.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/23/rubio-to-make-big-speech/
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2012, 04:29:52 PM »

Thune is basically Sen. Pawlenty. I've read profiles of him and everything about his career since 2004 screams vanilla.

Portman: He's qualified, but Romney is not going to pick one of GWB's highest-profile Cabinet members as his running mate.

Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2012, 03:43:40 PM »

Saw it as well. I'm still convinced that it will be either Ryan or Jindal, in that order.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2012, 09:33:51 PM »

Romney campaigned with McDonnell again today. Will he continue these tryouts now that everyone's had at least one shot is my question.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2012, 09:16:40 AM »

Uh, no. Just no.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #13 on: May 04, 2012, 09:42:33 AM »

First of all, Cantor's approval rating is underwater in Virginia itself. IIRC the number was something like 49-33 unfavorable. So forget helping Romney there.

Second, the idea of demographic/homeboy solidarity has been debunked. McDonnell, Portman and Rubio (the ones most mentioned in this scenario) don't move the needle in their home states- PPP has polled each man at least once.

Finally, I don't see what he brings that others don't.


Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #14 on: May 04, 2012, 09:59:44 AM »

It looks like we'll have to agree to disagree here.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
« Reply #15 on: May 08, 2012, 09:29:20 PM »

McDonnell, or so he claims, is not being currently vetted. Not like he'd say he was if so.

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/mcdonnell-says-hes-not-being-vetted-romney-vp/528256
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 13 queries.