SENATE BILL: Comprehensive Protection of Nuclear Power Act (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 06:53:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Comprehensive Protection of Nuclear Power Act (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Comprehensive Protection of Nuclear Power Act (Law'd)  (Read 2035 times)
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« on: April 06, 2012, 10:32:26 AM »
Should we define "geological safety" somehow?
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2012, 10:28:41 AM »
Quote from: Senator TJ on April 06, 2012, 08:11:03 PM
Quote from: ilikeverin on April 06, 2012, 10:32:26 AM
Should we define "geological safety" somehow?

I would think it should be clear enough that it is refering to being built on a major fault line that experiences earthquakes large enough to cause damage.

But is that adequate?  For example, would that cover the New Madrid Seismic Zone?  What if something like the Charleston earthquake happened again?  I mean, technically, the Yellowstone Caldera is a big geologically unsafe thing, but it's nowhere near a fault zone.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2012, 08:13:16 AM »
Grin Yup
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.