Third Parties in the Internet Age
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:15:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Third Parties in the Internet Age
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Third Parties in the Internet Age  (Read 749 times)
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,179
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 27, 2012, 08:39:59 PM »

The internet has been heralded as the "great equalizer", allowing "the little guy" to get his message out.  Third party political candidates have a much easier time campaigning and interfacing with voters now than they did twenty years ago.  My question is this; will the third parties continue to perform perceptibly better as the internet evolves and matures?
Logged
BritishDixie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 278
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2012, 04:05:44 AM »

No, because of the perception that only the Democrats or the Republicans can win the Presidency, and that a vote for a third party is a wasted vote. I can see third parties getting say 2-3% of the vote more regularly, but it takes some major crisis or event to boost a third party above 5%.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2012, 06:09:31 AM »

The USA's system of using open primaries to determine party nominees for virtually every office means that it's usually more effective to try to wage an insurgent campaign within one of the two major parties than it is to actually go third party.  (As the Paulite insurgency is showing.)

Yes, the two major parties have gotten weaker (and yes, the internet has contributed to that), but what that means is that they've weakened in their ability to control their own membership, not that they're at risk of being supplanted by a third party.  (Though I do wonder if, many years down the line, the Paulite insurgency might threaten to blow the GOP apart.)
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2012, 08:15:22 AM »

Hopefully yes, probably no. Look at attempts to mobilize a third party via the Internet (Americans Elect). Didn't work.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2012, 09:13:52 PM »

The rise of the Falconist Party is inevitable.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2012, 06:37:48 PM »

Hopefully yes, probably no. Look at attempts to mobilize a third party via the Internet (Americans Elect). Didn't work.

One of the other big problems with Americans Elect is that it didn't have an ideology or stand on any issue really, thus people had no reason to join it. You would need to have a single ideology left unrepresented by either party with enough followers to supplant one of the two and it would need to be an ideology that doesn't necessarily fit better into one party than it does the other (otherwise it would just be absorbed).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 12 queries.