Romney ad: "We fired Santorum. Why promote him?" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 08:20:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Romney ad: "We fired Santorum. Why promote him?" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Romney ad: "We fired Santorum. Why promote him?"  (Read 2171 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: April 09, 2012, 09:30:01 AM »

He isn't letting his Super PAC do his dirty work on this one. Interesting line of attack in saying that "we" fired Santorum when Republicans overwhelmingly backed him and Romney himself donated to Rick in 2006. That's why it's especially strange that Romney himself is doing this ad. Did Mitt support Casey?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/04/mitts-pennsylvania-attack-we-fired-him-as-senator-119974.html
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2012, 09:31:58 AM »

...and now the word is that the ad is being pulled out of respect for Santorum staying home with Bella.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2012, 09:56:22 AM »

...sheds some light on Romney's decision not to seek re-election himself in 2006.

Sheds light? Please. Everyone and their mother knows why he didn't run. He was going to get walloped but tries to feed us this nonsense that running for re-election would have only served him personally (yet admits that as President, he'd "obviously" run for re-election. What. A. Joke.).
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2012, 10:29:15 AM »

So Phil, are you going to support Romney in the General?

I have consistently said that I will not comment on my vote if Romney is the nominee. I don't know how I'll be voting as of now anyway.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2012, 11:03:19 AM »

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win re-election is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

But Mitt claims he was so accomplished. Why not run even if it meant a loss? He apparently had such a great record...
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2012, 07:19:43 PM »

I'd really love to hear Rick ask Romney if he supported Casey in 2006.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.