yeah, cuz you're a basket of roses too.
I'm not going to dignify Democrat rhetoric with anything more than Republican rhetoric. Sorry.
pbrower can say all he wants about what he believes trickle-down economics is based on, but it will always have that little Democrat twist. IE, rhetoric. Maybe he's just better at hiding it than I am, but he wasn't exactly using facts either.
I mean...
"Trickle-down economics is predicated on the idea that if the super-rich get even more rich they will have more cast-offs to give to the non-rich. We know how that works."
is the least substantive thing I've ever heard. "We know how that works"?? As if it's some fact? Give me a break. I can't reply to points that pretend to be factual with actual facts. Where would you even start?
And lastly... At least I'm not a snappy jackass to everyone (as you always seem to be to me Oakvale). Next time, don't put words in my mouth.
I was actually quoting a popular situation comedy as opposed to suggesting you
literally said that, but okay. This is like the time Politico reported me for "trolling" for posting an
Onion article.
