FINAL RATIFICATION VOTE PART 2 - AMENDMENTS (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 05:39:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Voting Booth (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  FINAL RATIFICATION VOTE PART 2 - AMENDMENTS (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FINAL RATIFICATION VOTE PART 2 - AMENDMENTS  (Read 17951 times)
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« on: March 28, 2004, 09:21:55 AM »





Finally, please vote whether there should be a sixth amendment providing for Australian-style preferential voting or no.

.

Why only preferential voting lets vote on EC too
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2004, 09:31:28 AM »


Why only preferential voting lets vote on EC too

The EC was already rejected. Theoretically, the preferential vote was already approved, but DemRepDan has not included the rule in his constitution.
no
the Pv was aprooved
the EV Got many votes and then there was another idea of the preferential voting . there was not a vote on the all 3.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2004, 01:24:53 PM »

I vote yes on the first amendment
I vote yes on the second amendment
I vote yes on the third amendment
I abstain on the fifth amendment
I abstain on the preferential voting amendment  
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2004, 05:54:03 AM »

I change my vote on the The Preferential voting from abstain to yes
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2004, 06:53:28 AM »

Hugs and kisses to you all, in the non-gay way Smiley

Fresh bunch of flowers on your doorstep tomorrow morning Smiley
it was 10-10 and I changed from abstain to yes 23 minutes to go thank to Lewis.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2004, 07:07:46 AM »

should have been 2-3 but if tou say six I geuss it should have been 2X3....

Smiley
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2004, 07:36:00 AM »

i trust you completly
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2004, 11:49:54 AM »

The PV plan is bullsh**t.  It's specifically engineered to creat some sort of Progressive/ Democrat majority allignment without the two groups acctually needing to cooperate.  It was designed with an agenda in mind and anything like that should not be in the Consititution.
We wanted an EV system, you wanted the PV, man don't change the history
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2004, 11:54:17 AM »

The PV plan is bullsh**t.  It's specifically engineered to creat some sort of Progressive/ Democrat majority allignment without the two groups acctually needing to cooperate.  It was designed with an agenda in mind and anything like that should not be in the Consititution.
We wanted an EV system, you wanted the PV, man don't change the history

I wanted Electoral Votes to.  By PV I mean preferential voting.
sorry
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2004, 10:07:04 AM »

exectly
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.