Why 2012 is different to 2004 (and why that could mean a Romney win) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:09:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Why 2012 is different to 2004 (and why that could mean a Romney win) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why 2012 is different to 2004 (and why that could mean a Romney win)  (Read 4944 times)
BlueSwan
blueswan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,380
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -7.30

WWW
« on: April 18, 2012, 02:10:08 PM »

I more or less agree with the OP and would like to add the following important point: Romney is a centrist. Kerry wasn't. Therefore Romney is not seen as a scary candidate for either independents or moderate democrats. Romney inherently has a greater shot at winning independents over than Kerry had.

I still say this race is a toss-up with a slight advantage to Obama, that is tranformed into a disadvantage if the economy does not continue to improve.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.