SCOTUS Scenario #2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:20:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  SCOTUS Scenario #2
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: The USA PATRIOT ACT is challenged and reaches the Supreme Court.  How is it ruled?
#1
Constitutional; law upheld
 
#2
Unconstitutional; law overturned
 
#3
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 21

Author Topic: SCOTUS Scenario #2  (Read 538 times)
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,260
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 27, 2012, 01:55:09 PM »

Discuss.

Please only vote on what you think would happen under the current judges, not what you want to happen.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,076
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2012, 02:00:39 PM »

See #1 answer.
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,321
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2012, 03:03:31 PM »

Option 1 would be the ruling, Option 2 is what should happen.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 27, 2012, 09:48:39 PM »

Option 1, most likely 9-0 although I could see Thomas or one of the liberals dissenting.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 27, 2012, 10:10:42 PM »

The PATRIOT Act as a whole would not be a court case. It could only be challenged on a specific grounds, for a case that would only deal with those elements of the law. In fact it has been, in Holder vs Humanitarian Law Project, and the court upheld restrictions on communications with terrorist groups, 6-3.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 14 queries.