So it is fine for Scott Brown's adult daughter to have her health insurance covered on the government dime, but not for most Americans? And you see no hypocrisy in this?
I don't see hypocrisy. Brown in theory has voted to take away his daughter's insurance as well as that of other Americans. But as long as it's the law, she can take part in it. (Also, she's not him and isn't responsible for his politics, even though it's not like she hasn't benefited from the association.)
Well, you could say that but railing against a law while at the same time
choosing to participate in its programs for personal benefit looks two-faced. As Dr. Scholl pointed out, it was Brown's choice to have his daughter covered on his insurance. I am not blaming Ayla for her father's actions. The hypocrisy is his, not hers.