This is a much bigger issue than the silly furor over Warren and Native Americans. I mean, wasn't Scott Brown elected on part because he said he'd be a vote against Obamacare? That would be like my state's own Orrin Hatch getting elected (and re-elected for six terms) on the idea that the other guy has been in Washington too long. Oh wait...
How is this any different than Obama paying the 35% tax rate instead of voluntarily applying the 39.6% rate (and the "Buffett rule") to himself? Even if this story were true (pretty sure the congressional health care plan offered extended coverage to children beforehand), it doesn't imply actual dishonesty the way Warren acted.
So it is fine for Scott Brown's adult daughter to have her health insurance covered on the government dime, but not for most Americans?No, I don't believe that Ayla Brown should be covered under the government or anyone else who does not want to pay's dime, but that isn't the issue here.
Nope, no more than someone who opposes tax cuts taking advantage of them (like I suggested) or someone who thinks the post office should be privatized mailing a letter.
