SENATE BILL: April 2012 Foreign Policy Review (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 09:41:54 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: April 2012 Foreign Policy Review (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: April 2012 Foreign Policy Review (Passed)  (Read 9447 times)
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« on: May 03, 2012, 04:40:27 PM »

I hope my concerns will be addressed.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2012, 12:03:52 AM »

You make good points too Senator. Here is what I suggested:
My biggest problem with the Foreign Policy Review is the sustained use of the word "attack" to describe the goal of the tariff. Such is all but admitting economic warfare. While I support restrictions for rogue nations, describing it is an attack does more harm than good.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2012, 06:40:39 PM »

Partial: Specific restrictions such as selective tariffs or partial embargoes are to be in place to pressure the government to change course, not to change the regime itself. Foreign aid can be granted if the regime shows signs of progress towards democracy.

Credit for this phrasing goes to Mr. Joyce, who will be a valuable contributor to foreign policy I am sure. Senator Sbane also has some good ideas, they should be considered here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.