Why Obama looks better in the electoral college (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 09:57:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Why Obama looks better in the electoral college (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why Obama looks better in the electoral college  (Read 2939 times)
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,989
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

« on: May 08, 2012, 03:06:37 PM »

I think it's simple math: There are more D+1-5 PVI states out there than R+1-5 states. (using national average based on 2008)
D+ 1-5: PA, NJ, MI, WI, MN, IA, NV, CO, NM, OR, WA, NH, ME= 143 ev

R+1-5:MO, IN, NC, FL (these are conclusively R+) , for 2008 purposes OH,AZ, VA=118 ev.
 VA could easily flip to D+ this year and OH will be near the average, without those two the GOP would only have 76 ev from those states.

The GOP has a ton of likely 60% Romney/ R+8-13 states such as WV, AR, TN, LA etc. Obama's electoral votes are more efficiently allocated. If NC goes from R+3 to R+1-2, he could win nationally by 3-4 points but win 347 electoral votes.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,989
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2012, 04:26:57 PM »

But today is different than 2000,2004. AR, TN, WV, KY, LA etc have moved from R+3-5 to R+10 or more.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.