How the Paultards stole Nevada

[Joe Republic]

I've somehow been added to the mailing list for some libertarian Republican newsletter based in Nevada.  The author, Chuck Muth, was at the state convention last weekend, and his report actually made for quite a fascinating read (if you have the time and the inclination).  Especially since Muth is very much a libertarian himself, and yet even he clearly got sick of the Paultards' shenanigans.

Anyway, enjoy:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Oakvale]

I highly reccomend reading the Ron Paul forums for giggles if you find mass delusion entertaining.

Sample post -

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[All Along The Watchtower]

This is par for the course for the Ron Paul movement.

[argentarius]

How far did you get as a delegate Joe? Did they expose you as a RINO?

[Frozen Sky Ever Why]

Disgusting. More selective "Liberty" from the tin foil hat club.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Joe, it's your chance of becoming a RNC delegate.

[Joe Republic]

How far did you get as a delegate Joe? Did they expose you as a RINO?

I didn't even bother going to the county convention.  I couldn't justify donating the necessary $40, or indeed any money at all, to the Republican Party.  Plus, I didn't get the time off work either.

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

Hopefully the Paulites can pull some platform stuff in Indiana.

[they don't love you like i love you]

This is so f**king awesome. Those Paulites have my utmost respect. Keep up the good work in making life a living hell for the Republicans!

[King]

Paultards need to find out the hard way that government ain't as easy they think.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Hopefully the Paulites can pull some platform stuff in Indiana.

Hopefully you can leave this forum.

I know, chances of you leaving are as slim as Paultards being relevant.

[All Along The Watchtower]

Paultards need to find out the hard way that government ain't as easy they think.

SOUND MONETARY POLICY

[Donerail]

Excellent. Seems like Nevada, for one, now has a sane GOP.

[Reluctant Republican]

I'm a big Paul supporter, but this behavior will only hurt us in the long run. Imagine the outcry if Paul had won all of the popular votes in these states and was now being shut out of delegates or influence. There would be RIOTS.

Even if the strategy somehow worked, giving the nomination to the man who was 4th in total votes received during the primary would produce such a backlash that it would ultimately hurt the movement, and probably hurt all non establishment approved campaigns in the future. Is it worth the risk?

[Yelnoc]

Excellent. Seems like Nevada, for one, now has a sane GOP.

Did you even read the OP?

[LastVoter]

This is so f**king awesome. Those Paulites have my utmost respect. Keep up the good work in making life a living hell for the Republicans!

[MyRescueKittehRocks]

Hopefully the Paulites can pull some platform stuff in Indiana.

Hopefully you can leave this forum.

I know, chances of you leaving are as slim as Paultards being relevant.

We are more relevant than you think. It's Paulites not Paultards.

[Purch]

Paultards need to find out the hard way that government ain't as easy they think.

Right but Republicans who scream that cutting taxes is the end all to all of America's problems CLEARLY Have a great understanding of how the goverment works. Along with democrats who claim rasing taxing on the rich fixes all our problems.

But of course the group of people who just speak about being finacially stable and decreasing our military budget are the ones who have no idea how the goverment works. Clearly the people who understand that are current investments both overseas and domestically are the crazy ones.

[Zioneer]

Paultards need to find out the hard way that government ain't as easy they think.

Right but Republicans who scream that cutting taxes is the end all to all of America's problems CLEARLY Have a great understanding of how the goverment works. Along with democrats who claim rasing taxing on the rich fixes all our problems.

But of course the group of people who just speak about being finacially stable and decreasing our military budget are the ones who have no idea how the goverment works. Clearly the people who understand that are current investments both overseas and domestically are the crazy ones.

But that's unfair; there's plenty of Democrats that want to reduce military spending, and the last surplus we had was under a present that raised taxes, cut spending, and (after the Balkan mess) reduced the amount of military adventures the US was involved in.

You've got to have a combination of all three, you can't just have reduced spending. Gutting social programs would wreak havoc on... pretty much everything.

[tpfkaw]

surplus

haha

You must be logged in to read this quote.

lol!

You must be logged in to read this quote.

You really are a card, aren't you!

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

CONSPIRACY ALERT: I think the Paulite takeovers MAY have been facilitated by Rand to advance his own career, even if it makes his father look bad. The base for a potential Rand Paul campaign in 2016 will be much stronger.

[Purch]

Paultards need to find out the hard way that government ain't as easy they think.

Right but Republicans who scream that cutting taxes is the end all to all of America's problems CLEARLY Have a great understanding of how the goverment works. Along with democrats who claim rasing taxing on the rich fixes all our problems.

But of course the group of people who just speak about being finacially stable and decreasing our military budget are the ones who have no idea how the goverment works. Clearly the people who understand that are current investments both overseas and domestically are the crazy ones.

But that's unfair; there's plenty of Democrats that want to reduce military spending, and the last surplus we had was under a present that raised taxes, cut spending, and (after the Balkan mess) reduced the amount of military adventures the US was involved in.

You've got to have a combination of all three, you can't just have reduced spending. Gutting social programs would wreak havoc on... pretty much everything.

I hope you're not referring to the president who bombed that crap out of Iraq and Afghanistan during his impeachment.

But yes it has to be a combination. Which is why Simpson-Bowles actually looked like a light at the end of a dim tunnel. But Obama didn't push it through when he needed to , Paul Ryan backed away from it and we continue down a cliff.

[Ⓐnarchy in the ☭☭☭P!]

Paultards need to find out the hard way that government ain't as easy they think.

Right but Republicans who scream that cutting taxes is the end all to all of America's problems CLEARLY Have a great understanding of how the goverment works. Along with democrats who claim rasing taxing on the rich fixes all our problems.

But of course the group of people who just speak about being finacially stable and decreasing our military budget are the ones who have no idea how the goverment works. Clearly the people who understand that are current investments both overseas and domestically are the crazy ones.

But that's unfair; there's plenty of Democrats that want to reduce military spending, and the last surplus we had was under a present that raised taxes, cut spending, and (after the Balkan mess) reduced the amount of military adventures the US was involved in.

You've got to have a combination of all three, you can't just have reduced spending. Gutting social programs would wreak havoc on... pretty much everything.

The "last surplus" was funded by looting Social Security for extra cash and shuffling around the money to give the appearance of being in the black. Not jacking up spending certainly helped, but it was a rather cheap monetary trick that can only work once in a while.

[Donerail]

CONSPIRACY ALERT: I think the Paulite takeovers MAY have been facilitated by Rand to advance his own career, even if it makes his father look bad. The base for a potential Rand Paul campaign in 2016 will be much stronger.

Seems possible, but will the Paulites turn out for Rand? I, for one, like the father but don't really like the son (he seems too neoconny for me...)

[they don't love you like i love you]

CONSPIRACY ALERT: I think the Paulite takeovers MAY have been facilitated by Rand to advance his own career, even if it makes his father look bad. The base for a potential Rand Paul campaign in 2016 will be much stronger.

Seems possible, but will the Paulites turn out for Rand? I, for one, like the father but don't really like the son (he seems too neoconny for me...)

A Democrat who likes Paul? You might like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aM9pXlxkomQ