Which of these baptisms should be considered valid? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 27, 2024, 04:02:17 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Discussion

Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)

Which of these baptisms should be considered valid? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Which of these baptisms should be considered valid?

#1 Sprinkling baptism of a baby by a clergyperson		14 (66.7%)
#2 Full immersion baptism of an adult by a clergyperson		16 (76.2%)
#3 Full immersion baptism of an adult who was baptized as a baby by a clergyperson		12 (57.1%)
#4 Full immersion baptism of an adult using only the name of Jesus and not the Trinitarian formula		5 (23.8%)
#5 Sprinkling baptism of an adult		12 (57.1%)
#6 Baptism in a Mormon temple		9 (42.9%)
#7 "Baptism" of a dead person by proxy in a Mormon temple		2 (9.5%)
#8 Sprinkling baptism of a baby by an unordained relative		4 (19%)
#9 Full immersion baptism of an adult by a church leader "ordained" only in a very loose sense		9 (42.9%)
#10 Full immersion baptism of an adult who was baptized as a baby by a church leader "ordained" only in a very loose sense		8 (38.1%)
#11 Full immersion baptism of a somewhat intoxicated adult (who was probably baptized as a baby) by a somewhat intoxicated vocalist of a Christian hardcore band in a bathtub at an after show party		4 (19%)
#12 NOTA/Other (explain)		2 (9.5%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 21

Calculate results by number of options selected

Author

Topic: Which of these baptisms should be considered valid? (Read 4850 times)

Jump to:

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.