SENATE BILL: WHITE HOUSE BUDGET PROPOSAL (On the President's Desk) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:29:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: WHITE HOUSE BUDGET PROPOSAL (On the President's Desk) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: WHITE HOUSE BUDGET PROPOSAL (On the President's Desk)  (Read 28559 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« on: May 23, 2012, 01:22:03 AM »

IIRC we have a very robust social security net passed under the social security act. We can try and change eligibilities or payment amounts to save money.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2012, 12:52:52 AM »

Aye
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2012, 12:59:57 AM »

Aye on the gasoline tax.

I will not be supporting the higher tax on corporations. Those taxes are passed on to the consumers or it leads to lower hiring. Income taxes are already high as well, so I don't see the need to raise rates there as well.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2012, 11:58:07 PM »

Aye
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2012, 08:37:29 PM »

I would like to submit an amendment that changes the healthcare costs in the proposed budget to those forecast by the GM due to the passage of the new healthcare bill.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2012, 08:38:37 PM »

So with the passage of Amendments 49:30 and 49:31 we reduced the proposed top rate from 55% to 50% and then raised it back up to 60%?
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2012, 02:00:13 PM »

Nay. I like the other amendment.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2012, 02:11:48 AM »

Seriously? I proposed a very moderate amendment, the one that only taxes the harmful activities by the rich. It's really unfair for Atlasians to lose services when the rich are getting a tax cut.

I have nothing against the financial transaction tax. I support your second amendment basically. We will vote on it in due time.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2012, 07:54:31 PM »

Seriously? I proposed a very moderate amendment, the one that only taxes the harmful activities by the rich. It's really unfair for Atlasians to lose services when the rich are getting a tax cut.

You're characterizing financial transactions as "harmful activities"?
Speculation is  a harmful activity.

So your solution is to drive the little guy out of the stock market?
It's a % tax not a flat tax... The idea is to curb Wall Street.
It's still another tax on top of the fees already charged by private services. Also, trying to "curb" the stock exchange probably isn't the best solution to economic growth.

At that low rate I don't expect there to be a big reduction in activity. I favor this because it hits the idle rich who only pay capital gains taxes and not income taxes which in America is much lower than the income tax rate.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2012, 07:59:17 PM »

Looks like we don't have a capital gains tax or an estate tax. I would be willing to lower income tax rates further and enact these new taxes.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #10 on: July 06, 2012, 01:30:08 AM »

Why don't we pass the amendent proposed with a top rate of 50% and rate cuts for lower income people as well? And add in some payroll tax cuts on top of that? We would need to see how much we could cut while still maintaining a surplus.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2012, 10:43:01 PM »

Does the current budge(without :36) have the Financial transaction tax?

Yes, Amendment 49:34 does include the financial transaction tax with a top tax rate of 50% and the rate reductions on the bottom two brackets. That is what I support.

Nay on Amendment 49:36.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #12 on: July 25, 2012, 01:57:59 AM »

Aye
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #13 on: July 31, 2012, 12:56:41 AM »

Huh, looks like that huge budget surplus wasn't so huge after all.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,308


« Reply #14 on: August 01, 2012, 10:41:29 PM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.