MO-PPP: All tied up in both primary and general
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:30:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  MO-PPP: All tied up in both primary and general
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO-PPP: All tied up in both primary and general  (Read 790 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 29, 2012, 03:10:37 PM »

Too many to list.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_MO_529.pdf
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2012, 04:11:17 PM »

I actaually think Tester is better-off to win reelection than McCaskill.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2012, 04:30:07 PM »

So McCaskill is down by a few points?
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2012, 04:34:47 PM »


She's tied at 44 with Steelman, down 44-45 to Akin and leads Brunner 46-44.

In the primary, its 28% Steelman, 25% Brunner, 23% Aiken.
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2012, 04:47:15 PM »


She's tied at 44 with Steelman, down 44-45 to Akin and leads Brunner 46-44.

In the primary, its 28% Steelman, 25% Brunner, 23% Aiken.

I meant with a corrected sample. A sample 5 points more D than 2006 makes zero sense.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2012, 05:30:09 PM »

How is McCaskill struggling so bad?

I think she may narrow if she can attack the sh**t out of Akin or even Steeleman.
Logged
timothyinMD
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 438


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2012, 03:56:50 PM »

McCaskill is doomed for the same reason Blanche Lincoln was.  The state is trending Republican and they don't want a Dem senator anymore.  Look for the republican, likely Steelman, to pull away in September and defeat McCaskill by 7-9 points
Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2012, 04:02:47 PM »

McCaskill is doomed for the same reason Blanche Lincoln was.  The state is trending Republican and they don't want a Dem senator anymore.  Look for the republican, likely Steelman, to pull away in September and defeat McCaskill by 7-9 points

Maybe not that much, but otherwise agreed. Steelman might lose the primary at this rate and Brunner is no Ron Johnson. Serviceable but would need some work. Akin would be like Berg- making the race harder than it should be on paper.

That said, I can't bring myself to dislike McCaskill. Always had time for her.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2012, 06:08:12 PM »

Lincoln was trailing 20 points by this time in 2010. Be realistic.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,775


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2012, 06:58:42 PM »

McCaskill is doomed for the same reason Blanche Lincoln was.  The state is trending Republican and they don't want a Dem senator anymore.  Look for the republican, likely Steelman, to pull away in September and defeat McCaskill by 7-9 points

The state is trending away from the Ds, but not anywhere near to the same extent as Arkansas.

McCatskill may very well lose (I'd give her a 40% survival chance, and that's only as high as it is because she's a superior politician in terms of electioneering), but it's not a done deal, and MO is hardly unwinnable for Dems.  It might be unwinnable for Obama, but not for down-ticket Dems.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 15 queries.