OH-Rasmussen: Romney takes small lead
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:44:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  OH-Rasmussen: Romney takes small lead
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: OH-Rasmussen: Romney takes small lead  (Read 1885 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 31, 2012, 07:57:16 AM »

Ohio: Romney 46%, Obama 44%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/ohio/election_2012_ohio_president
Logged
NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,687
Mexico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2012, 11:16:05 AM »

I see Scottie is at it again.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2012, 11:19:10 AM »


Sometimes I wonder if he believes his own polls.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2012, 11:48:47 AM »

Thank you (R)asmussen...
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2012, 01:45:53 PM »

I gurantee Scotty fudged these numbers to create a headline. It breaks off from his previous pattern of Obama crushing Romney, while the Republican challenger crushed the Democratic incumbent. 
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,736
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2012, 01:56:52 PM »

Sigh.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2012, 02:28:36 PM »

Rasmussen has been very consistent with other pollsters in Ohio, showing Obama with a moderate lead. It's certainly good news for Romney that he's now tied here.

There's usually not much joking at Rasmussen's reputation the many times his polling is consistent with others (which normally are). It's just whenever he shows Romney leading in a swing state.

Also, I'd hardly call Obama's small leads in Ohio "crushing".
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,282
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 31, 2012, 02:33:46 PM »

So Obama's actually leading by three or so.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 31, 2012, 02:40:38 PM »

Rasmussen has been very consistent with other pollsters in Ohio, showing Obama with a moderate lead. It's certainly good news for Romney that he's now tied here.

There's usually not much joking at Rasmussen's reputation the many times his polling is consistent with others (which normally are). It's just whenever he shows Romney leading in a swing state.

Also, I'd hardly call Obama's small leads in Ohio "crushing".

Yeah, Ras polls are viewed as accurate pretty much elsewhere except this site.
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 31, 2012, 02:44:35 PM »

Yeah, Ras polls are viewed as accurate pretty much elsewhere except this site.

538 and electoralvote.com would like to disagree with you. They had a 3/4 point bias in favor of Republican candidates in 2010. We have to see if he's fixed his issue.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 31, 2012, 02:48:07 PM »

Rasmussen has been very consistent with other pollsters in Ohio, showing Obama with a moderate lead. It's certainly good news for Romney that he's now tied here.

There's usually not much joking at Rasmussen's reputation the many times his polling is consistent with others (which normally are). It's just whenever he shows Romney leading in a swing state.

Also, I'd hardly call Obama's small leads in Ohio "crushing".

Yeah, Ras polls are viewed as accurate pretty much elsewhere except this site.

False, they aren't viewed as accurate by any reputable site (many "serious" sites are awful). As far as I know, even many Republicans view Rass poll results as slanted and strange.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2012, 02:55:19 PM »

Rasmussen has been very consistent with other pollsters in Ohio, showing Obama with a moderate lead. It's certainly good news for Romney that he's now tied here.

There's usually not much joking at Rasmussen's reputation the many times his polling is consistent with others (which normally are). It's just whenever he shows Romney leading in a swing state.

Also, I'd hardly call Obama's small leads in Ohio "crushing".

Yeah, Ras polls are viewed as accurate pretty much elsewhere except this site.

False, they aren't viewed as accurate by any reputable site (many "serious" sites are awful). As far as I know, even many Republicans view Rass poll results as slanted and strange.

In the past couple months, I would argue Rasmussen's polling has looked more "on target" than PPP's. The only outlier Ras has had was probably the Romney +8 in NC - the rest of their recent polling looks entirely plausible. In comparision, PPP has Obama ahead in Missouri (which is probably less plausible than Romney ahead in Ohio), had Obama up 13 in New Hampshire, 12 in Virginia, and 10 in Iowa, which is contradictory to other polling in those states. If anyone believes those numbers are true, in comparision to what national numbers are showing, well, I have a bridge to sell you.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 31, 2012, 03:14:09 PM »

Safe D.
Logged
Kevin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,424
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2012, 03:18:31 PM »

Yeah, Ras polls are viewed as accurate pretty much elsewhere except this site.

538 and electoralvote.com would like to disagree with you. They had a 3/4 point bias in favor of Republican candidates in 2010. We have to see if he's fixed his issue.

Like electoralvote.com is actually accurate(Their predictions for 2004, 2006, and 08 were all way off). Plus if my memory serves me correct they use Zogby's outfit as their source.

Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,145
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2012, 03:20:31 PM »

This is a pretty weak lead for Romney coming from Rasmussen.
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2012, 04:03:46 PM »

Yeah, Ras polls are viewed as accurate pretty much elsewhere except this site.

538 and electoralvote.com would like to disagree with you. They had a 3/4 point bias in favor of Republican candidates in 2010. We have to see if he's fixed his issue.

Like electoralvote.com is actually accurate(Their predictions for 2004, 2006, and 08 were all way off). Plus if my memory serves me correct they use Zogby's outfit as their source.



Um...

2004: 47/51; His first time running the site. The most egregious error was Florida; this was his worst year.

2006: Every Senate election correctly predicted, missed the House by 8 seats (although correctly predicted Republicans would have 0 pick-ups).

2008: 49/51: Had McCain winning Indiana (Obama's victory was a surprise to many) and Missouri was a tie (which considering the final result, wasn't too far from the truth).

His polling model seems to be quite good.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.