talking points that piss you off (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 10:23:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  talking points that piss you off (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: talking points that piss you off  (Read 29865 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« on: June 07, 2012, 07:08:11 PM »

such and such is "voting against their own interest"  (the assumption being that self-interest must be defined as narrowly as possible and is predictable to someone thousands of miles away)
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2012, 11:10:15 PM »

4. "Pro-choice people are bad Catholics, but pro-death penalty pro-war and anti-poor people are good Catholics"

i'm not aware of anyone who uses that as a talking point.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2012, 11:26:14 PM »

4. "Pro-choice people are bad Catholics, but pro-death penalty pro-war and anti-poor people are good Catholics"

i'm not aware of anyone who uses that as a talking point.

Everyone heard about Kerry being denied communion.
I thought a talking point was something someone actually said. It involves rhetoric and argumentation to make a point.  If you put words in someone's mouth to characterize their position, that's not the same thing - even if you put quotation marks around it.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2012, 03:14:53 PM »

"The Democrats are the party of Science"

especially when said by liberal arts majors

It pisses you off because it's true. Wink

Only if all of the scientific world consisted of evolution, embryonic stem cell research, and global warming. All of that together isn't worth terribly much when the left is constantly trying to divert educational resources toward arts and humanities fields and encouraging people to major in something other than hard science since whether a field is practical or useful should apparently not be a consideration (at least according to most of the people on this board). Most of the liberals who are complaining about federal funding for embryonic stem cell research don't even understand why we would want to fund it instead of using adult stem cells.

The point is going over your head, I see. Democrats are the party of science because it's  overwhelmingly supported by scientists in a way that few parties around the world are.

The "science is defined as whatever a majority of scientists support" argument.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.