Barone: Rich liberals owned Obama into Keystone, Gay Marriage, Catholic fight (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 08:04:40 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Barone: Rich liberals owned Obama into Keystone, Gay Marriage, Catholic fight (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Barone: Rich liberals owned Obama into Keystone, Gay Marriage, Catholic fight  (Read 3225 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« on: June 14, 2012, 11:29:14 AM »

Well, yes, the Democrats don't care about middle class people, and especially middle class whites.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2012, 02:45:04 PM »

Those poor oppressed white people! Sad
This attitude goes a long way in supporting this statement. 
Well, yes, the Democrats don't care about middle class people, and especially middle class whites.

That actually meets the definition of irony.  You meant to weaken via mocking and you actually strengthened

White people, as a group, don't need to be actively 'cared about'.


Lots of people don't  need to be taken care of, but the government seems to do so anyway. That creates resentment, and thankfully, the massive exodus of whites from the Democratic party due to the war on whites.


A state like Wisconsin is populated by a majority of non college whites who just voted in a landslide for Scott Walker because he shares their values.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2012, 07:09:03 AM »

Those poor oppressed white people! Sad
This attitude goes a long way in supporting this statement. 
Well, yes, the Democrats don't care about middle class people, and especially middle class whites.

That actually meets the definition of irony.  You meant to weaken via mocking and you actually strengthened

White people, as a group, don't need to be actively 'cared about'.


Lots of people don't  need to be taken care of, but the government seems to do so anyway. That creates resentment, and thankfully, the massive exodus of whites from the Democratic party due to the war on whites.


A state like Wisconsin is populated by a majority of non college whites who just voted in a landslide for Scott Walker because he shares their values.

Just to be clear, is your argument here that action taken to benefit minorities who are perceived to be structurally disadvantaged constitutes a 'war on whites' because access to opportunities and services is somehow a zero-sum game?

In the long term, perhaps not. In the short term, government money and government favors are indeed finite. One can offer them either by taking from others, or taxing from others.

In general people favor the idea of lesser tax. This is particularly true of middle class whites!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.