Suprassing 300 electoral votes? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:48:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Suprassing 300 electoral votes? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Suprassing 300 electoral votes?  (Read 7063 times)
Penelope
Scifiguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


« on: June 15, 2012, 08:02:08 PM »

Yes. It's pretty likely, this is a very economics heavy election.



If the economy is reasonably good, Obama outspent Romney, and Romney didn't do so hot in the debates, Obama will probably take just about every swing state.



Obama: 368

However, if the economy is pretty bad or stagnant, Romney outspent Obama, and Romney had some good moments during the debates, Romney probably wins every swing state.



Romney: 322
Logged
Penelope
Scifiguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2012, 02:39:57 AM »

Yes. It's pretty likely, this is a very economics heavy election.



If grey is a potential swing state, then you might note that 538 rates MN, NJ, CT as having a greater probability of going R than GA and SC have of going D.

Hmm, interesting. That was a really rough map made right off my gut feeling in like ten seconds, so a couple of the more distant swing states (WA, NM, GA, SC, etc) could be switched around a bit probably.

But CT? Dang, a Romney landslide map could look really ugly, not even bringing political opinions into it. =(
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 15 queries.