Young Tweed vs. Department of Federal Elections

[Insula Dei]

As the North-East's chief judicial expert I can only say that I don't see how the Supreme Court could refuse to hear this case. I'm waiting for the DoFE's case before giving any further thoughts, but right now this case looks solid to me.

[Insula Dei]

Such a clear distinction between the institutional/legal level and the political level seems impossible to draw to me, and the Supreme Court should be allowed the leeway to draw a line in the sand for its own use. As far as I can see the Founders who drafted our present constitution clearly meant the articles above as we can read them now; why else would they have included them? If the SC judges that the stated beliefs of the administration-elect are not within the bounds of executive power as imposed by our wise and righteous constitution, then they must strike down this election's results and declare a candidate who is more in line with the constitutional requirements for the office as our next President. As I have said, I'm eagerly awaiting the case from the DoFE.